Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vB9DbU92011127 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 14:37:32 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eNfFA-0000YX-CP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 13:32:40 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eNfF9-0000YM-39 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 13:32:39 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eNfF5-0003J2-Ch for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 13:32:37 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E9120FEA for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 14:32:33 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512826354; bh=g4UYDAAtf05EVFWhh6XA0wXrvVKjrxCSIMQ2gQMkJvU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=SSuDRTAUwaVKU0nNyaf9NxocobWPVkHH3nbpizdBdj2/ytb/XjcefQ3psMdZZkfkA mwBdIcbbzBPaMjRD38lkgtBg86a3Ba0jPDBeEp9p0V8ZZzn/W38nTjrj5rvOhBrZTr dDkUzbrddrK2Z6nxPVjHp3hFjLoP9UG9WVA9LZT4pCcDucC62X5o3QCbwq5X89Spu8 hhg7fhJCKyViU3KvOZgsdetbXGkh5wJQfgDP4DcrBKFKkLsBJhwYoz5B97T0HMlwtl HdHlE/YnUDp2rMAPi/bgaOgpMfs0MGTTQaC4MpgmCFDIUSHkxRLFo/BoSpOMYdCwOg LzQJ24/9Lg+cg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yv9BT2Z5nz9rxQ for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 14:32:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A2BE5F0.1060301@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 14:32:32 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4d96a9d4-5f22-7650-872b-6344e9aea8e3@abelian.org> <5A19FF75.7080801@posteo.de> <5A1FFE7C.9050703@posteo.de> <5A226B0C.3080701@posteo.de> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAB0EB9@servigilant.vigilant.local> <5A25C304.3050607@posteo.de> <5A271218.9040803@posteo.de>,<1d9b2c0d-5fd5-066d-8f66-e85a79f88f16@abelian.org> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAB354F@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<5A27EEA4.5000408@posteo.de> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAB5023@servigilant.vigilant.local> <5A2AFE0B.7060402@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Jacek, I confirm the message you sent to me in a separate mail. My congrats. So 30+ characters would be no problem in one night. Luis, has already shown the message, so it is no secret :-) On my own grabber (which is still running), http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html the signal level is equal to that of GBZ 19.58 kHz ;-) But the distances are a bit different ;-) I can hear the signal loud and clear in a comfortable CW filter. It is at 35 dB in 366 mHz (without a NB) here in 3.5 km distance, which is the far field already :-) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Thanks Jacek, I confirm the message you sent to me in a separate mail. My congrats. So 30+ characters would be no problem in one night. Luis, has already shown the message, so it is no secret :-) On my own grabber (which is still running), http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html the signal level is equal to that of GBZ 19.58 kHz ;-) But the distances are a bit different ;-) I can hear the signal loud and clear in a comfortable CW filter. It is at 35 dB in 366 mHz (without a NB) here in 3.5 km distance, which is the far field already :-) 73, Stefan Am 09.12.2017 13:53, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski: > Stefan's transmission on 20171206 22:00 17470.1Hz: > > found rank 0 ber 2.2135e-01 Eb/N0 11.2 M -1.417898417e+00 [***] ps > [104 -60 -30 -30 0] > carrier phase: 9.6 deg > carrier Eb/N0: 12.0 dB > carrier Es/N0: -4.50 dB > carrier S/N: 24.35 dB in 32.6 uHz, -20.52 dB in 1Hz, -54.50 dB in 2.5kHz > elapsed 1187 > > And right now Stefan is almost overdriving my grabber (note that the > amplitude scale is set manually so the max amplitude is bigger than > what is presented on the scale): > > https://klubnl.pl/wpr/en/index.php/klubnl-pl-grabbers/tymczasowy-grabber-sq5bpf-do-testow-stefana-dk7fc-na-17-4701hz/ > > > 1.2A seems to be doing it's job. > > > VY 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > >