Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vB2Elkjn012271 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 15:47:49 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eL90e-00034i-Ft for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 14:43:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eL90e-00034Y-4l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 14:43:16 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eL90Y-0001LU-Mk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 14:43:14 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58D820E5C for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 15:43:08 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512225788; bh=PmA6f5LY/BW8IAM3SAt0m0koMc3BuNvJgwGgWbPUytc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Hnc9VlA7S6/kx3He8iUp89GOuRDDtALueYYskihRIDGl7IQBOBBLnuWtvZwZCqc8m BvGDbUW/tMV4kTLRnQ8TatuLovDDwyQRlREKy+JHJBqzGQVnq5ezbnWnWbyTAl9o7x bTIjICR2dGO3MCb814vXCN1q+14AXtCc06/l5x9hRiD8CPKYz4WtUWj85Hv3FpSsY9 PftMsiPMwazEICwX8U84612PprGJWE7mwmCJ0Tg2PflvqLhaBDctulahC3AlKoZTAw xzdrKqwTZWDNhAxdy2KxS/lRebxlPw6tWr9+8bdeBN8JduyWrUoR1+UxYHNe+CSVqm mRjvDUS2Wjlfg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3ypv5802sVzyrn for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 15:43:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A22BBFB.7080704@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 15:43:07 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4d96a9d4-5f22-7650-872b-6344e9aea8e3@abelian.org> <5A19FF75.7080801@posteo.de> <5A1FFE7C.9050703@posteo.de> <5A226B0C.3080701@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Max, Nice, thanks for the capture and congrats to the reception. Soon we may try a short EbNaut message, so there is a chance for you... 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID BODY: Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted Colors in HTML 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b2000330e4064ca60a9f57e731b892da Subject: Re: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090207090901060109040301" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, LINK_TO_NO_SCHEME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090207090901060109040301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Max, Nice, thanks for the capture and congrats to the reception. Soon we may try a short EbNaut message, so there is a chance for you... 73, Stefan Am 02.12.2017 13:23, schrieb Max IK0VVE: > Congrats dear friends!! > > Attached here the update from 424 uHz grabber. Restarted the 47 uHz... > problem again here. If possible I'll create an online grabber. The new > PC is not configured for web download at the moment. > > > ______________________________ > > /...here some of my HAM Radio projects.../ > */SkyGeM Rotator/* > */AntennaDinamica/* > */RCR-DX/* > / > / > /www.ik0vve.net/ > > > Da: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > A: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Cc: > Data: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 09:57:48 +0100 > Oggetto: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA > > Hello VLF friends, > This morning i looked on the EA5DOM VLF grabber and saw much better > traces of the carrier on 17.4701 kHz. > https://ea5dom.ure.es/grabber/index.html > I find this is a valid one-way contact or carrier detection and i think > it is the first time that this was done by amateurs between DL and EA. > A distance of 1393 km, http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=IM98XN&from=jn49ik00wd > It looks like there is some QSB on that path, higher than observed a > similar distance at 8270 Hz. > We can now think about improvements and about a first message attempt... > 73, Stefan --------------090207090901060109040301 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Max,

Nice, thanks for the capture and congrats to the reception.
Soon we may try a short EbNaut message, so there is a chance for you...

73, Stefan


Am 02.12.2017 13:23, schrieb Max IK0VVE:
Congrats dear friends!!

Attached here the update from 424 uHz grabber. Restarted the 47 uHz... problem again here. If possible I'll create an online grabber. The new PC is not configured for web download at the moment. 


______________________________

 
...here some of my HAM Radio projects...



Cc:
Data: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 09:57:48 +0100
Oggetto: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA

Hello VLF friends,
 
This morning i looked on the EA5DOM VLF grabber and saw much better
traces of the carrier on 17.4701 kHz.
 
I find this is a valid one-way contact or carrier detection and i think
it is the first time that this was done by amateurs between DL and EA.
 
It looks like there is some QSB on that path, higher than observed a
similar distance at 8270 Hz.
We can now think about improvements and about a first message attempt...
 
73, Stefan
 
--------------090207090901060109040301--