Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vB29AKQ0011225 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 10:10:22 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eL3cU-0001YE-Rq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 08:57:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eL3cU-0001Y5-32 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 08:57:58 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eL3cQ-0008WR-DD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 08:57:56 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7989920DEB for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 09:57:49 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512205071; bh=zsn24ABiQPH6xn8pTQzW//r1SsWUmxP20QRNQXs5mWs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=NUIk6IKFwi1K10oszVrDl/jifDfGdK0QjQYC5es7xSztja2RqegXRDsGZRfN/uZU3 bsJaQ5QN9qeIJ5lqqQ0NUPvAOK2o7DIJC69u6mZ2T1dMoxT4rx5jO2Kbj53Fm6zufg 4RgNtiL6eW1b03V2SZ4muWpDjl9wjt+x+5G8fQhenQyzAjsdv/iwbsLOMp3kxZbyX0 6ZUh9C+y7y76BJBKWe2mC6LpLnXaelUx8+KB0s8y+VKtdJibslDHBkJBiD0V3haB3c SPF3Na16qq10IUJufRta7EeWqZqjb3ZUiIqIg2f0Ev3TWpcb6l3z9n79Ras4VVgh0A d0hSMUnt8UgNA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yplQh4r4bz9rxD for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 09:57:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A226B0C.3080701@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 09:57:48 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" References: <4d96a9d4-5f22-7650-872b-6344e9aea8e3@abelian.org> <5A19FF75.7080801@posteo.de> <5A1FFE7C.9050703@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello VLF friends, This morning i looked on the EA5DOM VLF grabber and saw much better traces of the carrier on 17.4701 kHz. https://ea5dom.ure.es/grabber/index.html I find this is a valid one-way contact or carrier detection and i think it is the first time that this was done by amateurs between DL and EA. A distance of 1393 km, http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=IM98XN&from=jn49ik00wd [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 4ad5f3f1a9241b934aaa5d0e23c9dc57 Subject: VLF: First VLF detection DL > EA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello VLF friends, This morning i looked on the EA5DOM VLF grabber and saw much better traces of the carrier on 17.4701 kHz. https://ea5dom.ure.es/grabber/index.html I find this is a valid one-way contact or carrier detection and i think it is the first time that this was done by amateurs between DL and EA. A distance of 1393 km, http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=IM98XN&from=jn49ik00wd It looks like there is some QSB on that path, higher than observed a similar distance at 8270 Hz. We can now think about improvements and about a first message attempt... 73, Stefan