Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vAHG8mJG018054 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:08:50 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eFj61-0000JN-Hv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:02:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eFj61-0000JE-2q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:02:25 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eFj5w-0000JN-No for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:02:23 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94C1D2098B for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:02:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3ydjYN5pxzz108f for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:02:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A0F0808.3010404@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:02:16 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1581378296.20171117142913@chriswilson.tv> <5A0EF416.2080901@posteo.de> <1262035097.20171117151611@gmail.com> <6ecebb89-2835-b02c-57f4-14f3a6c8d30f@n1bug.com> In-Reply-To: <6ecebb89-2835-b02c-57f4-14f3a6c8d30f@n1bug.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Chris and Paul, Very well, that is a remarkable success over that path in JT9-1! When Paul will have his antenna ready, maybe you can have a two-way QSO :-) Paul, i still have some wire here that i bought just for LF some weeks ago. I could quickly wind a new coil and give you another signal to detect. But you see, i'm still quite busy on VLF... One day i will be back... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 61577e2058c0d3bf1737d7de6ed6eb16 Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Chris and Paul, Very well, that is a remarkable success over that path in JT9-1! When Paul will have his antenna ready, maybe you can have a two-way QSO :-) Paul, i still have some wire here that i bought just for LF some weeks ago. I could quickly wind a new coil and give you another signal to detect. But you see, i'm still quite busy on VLF... One day i will be back... 73, GL, Stefan Am 17.11.2017 16:48, schrieb N1BUG: > I have no words to express how much fun I am having just listening on > 2200m! This has really put the fun back into radio for me. It will be > even more fun when I get the transmitting antenna and transmitter up! > > I can monitor WSPR-2, JT9, and QRSS/DFCW simultaneously. I also just > added a secondary receiver which I use for CW reception or listening > to other things near the band. > > My thanks to Chris for being there every night providing a signal. So > far he is the only trans-Atlantic signal this season, though there > were others last winter. I hope to see more in the near future. > > I have no idea why PSKReporter didn't get my JT9 spots but I made a > screen capture showing the details: > > http://n1bug.com/2E0ILY-JT9-17Nov2017.jpg > > I was very pleased with 9 WSPR-2 spots in addition with best signal > -23. I had 8 the previous night. > > 73, > Paul N1BUG > > > On 11/17/2017 10:16 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: >> >> >> Hello Stefan, >> >> Thanks, I was detected last night twice I think by N1BUG and I was >> using JT-9 (one minute TX sequences). For whatever reason Paul did not >> get the spots showing on the PSKReporter site, even though his WSJT-X >> software had the box ticked to upload spots. When I was received in >> Europe on JT-9 ages ago only a few spots got on the map, it seems a >> bit flaky for JT-9 spots for some reason. I think Paul saw SNR's of >> -25 or -26 for the two. He got me 9 times last night with WSPR though, >> which suggests conditions are improving and his new low noise vertical >> receive antenna is doing a superb job! >> >> Friday, November 17, 2017, 2:37:10 PM, you wrote: >> >>> I think that W1VD has detected my signal some years ago. But that was >>> not JT9-1. There have been older versions of JT9, allowing to use >>> longer >>> time periods, up to 30 minutes i think! That was better for LF! >>> I am not so sure about the detection by W1VD. Maybe Jay want's to >>> comment... >> >>> 73, Stefan >> >> >>> Am 17.11.2017 15:29, schrieb Chris Wilson: >>>> 17 November 2017 >>>> >>>> >>>> Has there been a previous trans Atlantic reception of a JT-9 signal >>>> from the UK? >