Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vA9HYlBn020026 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 18:34:55 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eCqdt-0001Gs-2j for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:29:29 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eCqds-0001Gj-NW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:29:28 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eCqdo-0007fT-Gm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:29:27 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C3220CB5 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 18:29:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yXqsY5vGDz10HZ for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 18:29:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A049071.6000101@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:29:21 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15f97a252ec.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <65d2efca-36e8-b0dc-49fb-0077056b0aa0@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Domenico, Thanks for your continued interest in the very low frequencies :-) Are you using vttime to correct the sample rate? Or are you doing it in SpecLab? The Alpha trace looks maybe a bit unstable(?). If you have a second PC, you could try to make a local transmission, just with a piece of wire, and then checl if you can decode it. It would be a first check of the system. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 052e5a7ab87161a07560b72babff3441 Subject: Re: R: Re: VLF: EbNaut message over 2877 km, DK7FC to RC4HAA Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060908070604010605040806" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060908070604010605040806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Domenico, Thanks for your continued interest in the very low frequencies :-) Are you using vttime to correct the sample rate? Or are you doing it in SpecLab? The Alpha trace looks maybe a bit unstable(?). If you have a second PC, you could try to make a local transmission, just with a piece of wire, and then checl if you can decode it. It would be a first check of the system. I'm looking forward to the AMF!!! :-) 73, Stefan Am 09.11.2017 17:59, schrieb Domenico IZ7SLZ: > Hello VLF, > > First of all, congratulations to Stefan, Paul and all OM partecipating > at these experiments for the successfull results. > > I'm trying to receive some VLF Ebnaut, in Apulia -South Italy, till > now without joy. > > Unfortunatly, the remote location at Aunt Melina farm (AMF) , 5 km > away from my city is not yet ready. > In the same time i'm trying, in my urban usual location, to streaming > (locally) the audio captured from linux pc using vlfrx-tools utilities. > Vorbis stream sent by vtvorbis is received via lan from Spectrum Lab > on Xp PC. A 42 uHz grabber is running since 3 days now. > > http://qsl.net/iz7slz/OPDS/grabber.jpg > > Linux pc is also recording the raw audio using vtwrite. > So i'm making some attempts to decode Dk7fc ebnaut trying to guess the > best parameters for vtblank. > I have some question for Paul: > Can you suggest and give some indications how to stack raw audio of > two or more different days using vlfrx-tools? > > Some advice for the vtblank configuration? > > I'm using version 07p. > > ...and questions for Joe VO1NA: > Can you specify again the start time, frequency and all parameters of > your EBNAUT transmissions? Some long carrier has been transmitted by > you and in which hour? > Thanks in advance. > 73, Domenico /IZ7SLZ > > > > > On 9 Nov 2017 17:28, "Paul Nicholson" > wrote: > > > Stefan wrote: > > > f = 8270.1000 Hz > > Start time: 07.November.2017 16:00:00 UTC > > Symbol period: 60 s > > Characters: 3 > > CRC bits: 9 > > Coding 16K21A > > Duration: 12:32 > > > Paul, did you copy my message from last night and the night > > before? > > Yes, a strong signal here and perfect decode of the 3 chars: > > H-field E-field E+H field > 7th/8th 10.5 dB 99.8 deg 9.0 dB 107.3 deg 12.5 dB 103.3 deg > 8th/9th 14.1 dB 88.3 deg 12.5 dB 93.8 deg 17.3 dB 90.9 deg > > > I am getting no decode at RC4HAA, even when stacking both nights. > > Signal phase repeated fine both nights. Given the S/N of your 2 char > success, you would be very lucky to do 3 chars in one night, but two > nights ought to do it. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > --------------060908070604010605040806 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Domenico,

Thanks for your continued interest in the very low frequencies :-)

Are you using vttime to correct the sample rate? Or are you doing it in SpecLab? The Alpha trace looks maybe a bit unstable(?).
If you have a second PC, you could try to make a local transmission, just with a piece of wire, and then checl if you can decode it. It would be a first check of the system.

I'm looking forward to the AMF!!! :-)

73, Stefan

Am 09.11.2017 17:59, schrieb Domenico IZ7SLZ:
Hello VLF,

First of all, congratulations to Stefan, Paul and all OM partecipating at these experiments for the successfull results.

I'm trying to receive some VLF Ebnaut, in Apulia -South Italy, till now without joy.

Unfortunatly, the remote location at Aunt Melina farm (AMF) , 5 km away from my city is not yet ready. 
In the same time i'm trying, in my urban usual location, to streaming (locally) the audio captured from linux pc using vlfrx-tools utilities.
Vorbis stream sent by vtvorbis is received via lan from Spectrum Lab on Xp PC. A 42 uHz grabber is running since 3 days now.


Linux pc is also recording the raw audio using vtwrite. 
So i'm making some attempts to decode Dk7fc ebnaut trying to guess the best parameters for vtblank.
I have some question for Paul:
Can you suggest and give some indications how to stack raw audio of two or more different days using vlfrx-tools?

Some advice for the vtblank configuration? 

I'm using version 07p.

...and questions for Joe VO1NA:
Can you specify again the start time, frequency and all parameters of your EBNAUT transmissions? Some long carrier has been transmitted by you and in which hour?
Thanks in advance. 
73, Domenico /IZ7SLZ




On 9 Nov 2017 17:28, "Paul Nicholson" <vlf0403@abelian.org> wrote:

Stefan wrote:

> f = 8270.1000 Hz
> Start time: 07.November.2017  16:00:00 UTC
> Symbol period: 60 s
> Characters: 3
> CRC bits: 9
> Coding 16K21A
> Duration: 12:32

> Paul, did you copy my message from last night and the night
> before?

Yes, a strong signal here and perfect decode of the 3 chars:

            H-field           E-field             E+H field
 7th/8th  10.5 dB 99.8 deg   9.0 dB 107.3 deg   12.5 dB 103.3 deg
 8th/9th  14.1 dB 88.3 deg  12.5 dB  93.8 deg   17.3 dB  90.9 deg

> I am getting no decode at RC4HAA, even when stacking both nights.

Signal phase repeated fine both nights.  Given the S/N of your 2 char
success, you would be very lucky to do 3 chars in one night, but two
nights ought to do it.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

--------------060908070604010605040806--