Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vA8DhcoA015436 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 14:43:41 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eCQXz-0007LF-Rr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:37:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eCQXz-0007L6-8n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:37:39 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eCQXw-0001G2-In for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:37:38 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CF62082A for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 14:37:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yX6mZ1ZHfz10Hm for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 14:37:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A03089B.6060600@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:37:31 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <22d6c712-43af-3a5d-099e-adb285f086a1@n1bug.com> <7d1279b6d1a84b692d281d48901f2b23@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, My answer may be a bit late. It sounds to me like a EMC issue. A RF choke is needed in the supply line. 1 mH may be a good choice. And i would add a 1000 uF electrolytic capacitor with a low internal resistance (the good ones :-) ) near the Drain, in parallel to the 1 uF capacitor. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: Re: LF: PA problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, My answer may be a bit late. It sounds to me like a EMC issue. A RF choke is needed in the supply line. 1 mH may be a good choice. And i would add a 1000 uF electrolytic capacitor with a low internal resistance (the good ones :-) ) near the Drain, in parallel to the 1 uF capacitor. A few more arguments: It is not ideal to drive a class E with a linear signal. It is better (regarding efficiency) to use a hard keying by using a MOSFET driver such as ICL7667, TC4422 or so. A class E is not a design for linear modes, it is for a constant output power, good for QRSS/DFCW, CW, WSPR, OPERA, EbNaut... I would recommend to build a class D PA. You can use the existing components. A class D is much less critical regarding matching (SWR) and the efficiency can be in a range of > 90% at LF as well... 73, Stefan Am 08.11.2017 14:00, schrieb N1BUG: > There were many replies to my plea for help. I won't reply to all > individually but every reply is much appreciated! Thank you all! > > To respond to a few things: > > I do not need a linear amp. I spent much time looking for a medium > power (50W or so) class E amp but could not find any designs. There > are many 250W and up class D circuits around but they all get out of > my budget for this year. I found this and since it was affordable I > decided to give it a try. I knew it was risky but better to try > something than do nothing at all. > > Capacitors in the LPFs are all WIMA FKP. I did not feel any heating. > Capacitors in the amp are also FKP. > > I'm afraid I have very little experience or confidence in working with > SSPAs of any type. I have designed and built many a tube PA up to > 1500W at HF through UHF but working with FETs is all new to me. > > I have to spend today working on a tower but will return to this > project and try some of the suggestions I received as soon as possible. > > 73, > Paul N1BUG >