Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vA4IG017031838 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2017 19:16:01 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eB2sY-0005bI-CZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 18:09:10 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eB2sY-0005b7-17 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 18:09:10 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eB2sR-0003Yx-Nn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 18:09:08 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364CC20AA5 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2017 19:09:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yTmzc1GNnz10Hm for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2017 19:09:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <59FE023C.6020707@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2017 19:09:00 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15f68ccfd03-c09-1dcf0@webjas-vaa134.srv.aolmail.net> <40168a26-8991-6998-e541-585a8575ad32@abelian.org> <59FCCC81.6080208@posteo.de> <09a95523-6084-4cc4-6808-301fbdfda3e1@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <09a95523-6084-4cc4-6808-301fbdfda3e1@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul, many thanks for the feedback. Amazing! It never gets boring. I just calculated, with 31.7 dB in 34.7 uHz, the 300 charcter message could have been passed last night in just these 8 hours. Crazy. Hasn't the SNR been better in daytime between us? So maybe you caught the message after one day? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: Re: VLF: Carrier on 8270.005 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Paul, many thanks for the feedback. Amazing! It never gets boring. I just calculated, with 31.7 dB in 34.7 uHz, the 300 charcter message could have been passed last night in just these 8 hours. Crazy. Hasn't the SNR been better in daytime between us? So maybe you caught the message after one day? 73, Stefan Am 04.11.2017 10:35, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > Stefan wrote: > > > plain carrier is now running since 19:30 UTC on 8270.005 Hz. > > A great big signal here, 0.30 fT > > http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=1509778800&b=120&s=fd > > In 34.7 uHz (22:00 to 06:00): > > H-field: 26.66 dB 93.1 deg > E-field: 24.99 dB 96.0 deg > > Combined: 31.70 dB. > > Pointing in the opposite direction, S/N is -4.8 dB so there's > a fairly good notch at the back of the pattern. > > I'm looking forward to rigging that spectrogram to use all > three axes so that the bearings will be mod 360 and we will > have an extra few dB gain. > > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >