Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vA1JeWao019169 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:40:34 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e9yn6-0001Io-Hq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 19:35:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e9yn5-0001If-RE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 19:35:07 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e9yn2-0007Vq-IV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 19:35:06 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0871820BA9 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:35:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yRz2H1tcvz10HX for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:35:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <59FA21E7.3000203@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 20:35:03 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <46184300.20171024141617@gmail.com> <1616255525.20171101070645@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Hugh, As mentioned in my other mail, a noise blanker can cause multiple decodes on WSPR. Also it is worth to check that all 'sound effects' such as AGC are disabled on the RX path. A narrow band filter may help as well. Maybe the RX has not enough dynamic range is is partly nonlinear due to the strong signals by DCF39 and HGA22. Then another strong in band signal may seem to cause interference. [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 9be7bcf37980c7e1f7256b45328d3ffd Subject: Re: LF: MF/160 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050101010603010605090608" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050101010603010605090608 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Hugh, As mentioned in my other mail, a noise blanker can cause multiple decodes on WSPR. Also it is worth to check that all 'sound effects' such as AGC are disabled on the RX path. A narrow band filter may help as well. Maybe the RX has not enough dynamic range is is partly nonlinear due to the strong signals by DCF39 and HGA22. Then another strong in band signal may seem to cause interference. Same with the sidebands. As Mal recently described, i sometimes see stations uploading decodes from my WSPR signal on 475.685 Hz and 475.785 Hz. The sideband decode is about 42 dB weaker. BUT, from the same transmission, there are stations getting a stronger decode on the main frequency and no decode on the sideband frequency. So the RX side is playing a role too... Just some thoughts. 73, GL, Stefan Am 01.11.2017 11:49, schrieb dhchurch: > Hello Chris > I removed the telephone line from the external shack and installed a > cordless system, it made a small difference, and now there is also > effectively a 30dB attenuator but it means smaller signals are not > decoded which is a shame. I can see them on a seperate spectrum > analyser, Droitwich is about the same. > Now I have to deal with some spurious responses in Opera. This is > running Opera, WSPR2 and 15, and Spectrum Analyser simultaneously > which I always used to do. Have you checked the erp with anyone > externally as any digital notch I put into the RF input is still too > broad? > Hugh, M0DSZ > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > > *From:* Chris Wilson > *Receiver:* dhchurch > *Time:* 2017-11-01, 07:06:45 > *Subject:* Re: LF: MF/160 > > Hello Hugh, > > It looks like you have managed to resolve the multiple signals from me > at your end, nothing has changed here, I have seen no multiple WSPR > receptions from you reported over the last couple of days, and signal > levels look more appropriate compared with other nearby stations, > here's last nights results: > > 2017-10-31 18:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +15 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 19:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +16 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 19:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +17 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 20:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +16 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 20:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +16 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 20:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +15 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 21:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +15 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 21:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +14 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 21:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +14 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 22:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +13 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 22:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 22:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 23:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 23:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-10-31 23:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 00:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 00:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 00:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 01:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 01:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 01:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 02:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +12 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 02:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +12 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 02:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 03:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 03:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +10 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 03:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +10 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 04:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 04:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +10 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 04:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 05:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 05:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 05:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +12 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 06:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +12 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > 2017-11-01 06:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +12 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244 > > > Is this now sorted? :) What was it if you don't mind me asking? > > > > Tuesday, October 24, 2017, 7:57:58 PM, you wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Jay > > > > There are 2 receivers, one a Kenwood R5000 and the other an > > SDRPlay RSP2. The former feeds a UHF link from shack to house, both > > ends running off 12V batteries with solar chargers. The R5000 can > > also run from 12V dc for the tests but not for long. The RSP2 gives > > the same results both in the shack and the house and powers from a > > USB input. This is the same with a desktop or a laptop running from > > it's own battery. The bandwidth filter is standard USB for the > R5000 and 2kHz for the RSP2. > > > > This is where an independent assessment would be handy. There's not > > much point in posting the results but there are traces up to 500Hz > > away. I have only seen large sidebands on Mal's (G3KEV) but not > usually. > > > > Hugh, M0DSZ > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com > > --------------050101010603010605090608 Content-Type: text/html; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Hugh,

As mentioned in my other mail, a noise blanker can cause multiple decodes on WSPR. Also it is worth to check that all 'sound effects' such as AGC are disabled on the RX path. A narrow band filter may help as well. Maybe the RX has not enough dynamic range is is partly nonlinear due to the strong signals by DCF39 and HGA22. Then another strong in band signal may seem to cause interference.

Same with the sidebands. As Mal recently described, i sometimes see stations uploading decodes from my WSPR signal on 475.685 Hz and 475.785 Hz. The sideband decode is about 42 dB weaker. BUT, from the same transmission, there are stations getting a stronger decode on the main frequency and no decode on the sideband frequency. So the RX side is playing a role too...

Just some thoughts.

73, GL, Stefan

Am 01.11.2017 11:49, schrieb dhchurch:
Hello Chris 
I removed the telephone line from the external shack and installed a cordless system, it made a small difference, and now there is also effectively a 30dB attenuator but it means smaller signals are not decoded which is a shame. I can see them on a  seperate spectrum analyser, Droitwich is about the same.
Now I have to deal with some spurious responses in Opera. This is running Opera, WSPR2 and 15, and Spectrum Analyser simultaneously which I always used to do. Have you checked the erp with anyone externally as any digital notch I put into the RF input is still too broad?
Hugh, M0DSZ
 
----- Receiving the following content -----
Receiver: dhchurch
Time: 2017-11-01, 07:06:45
Subject: Re: LF: MF/160

Hello Hugh,

It looks like you have managed to resolve the multiple signals from me
at your end, nothing has changed here, I have seen no multiple WSPR
receptions from you reported over the last couple of days, and signal
levels look more appropriate compared with other nearby stations,
here's last nights results:

 2017-10-31 18:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +15 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 19:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +16 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 19:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +17 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 20:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +16 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 20:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +16 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 20:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +15 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 21:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +15 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 21:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +14 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 21:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +14 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 22:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +13 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 22:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 22:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 23:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 23:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-10-31 23:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 00:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 00:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 00:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 01:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 01:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 01:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 02:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +12 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 02:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +12 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 02:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 03:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 03:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +10 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 03:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +10 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 04:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 04:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +10 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 04:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 05:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 05:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +11 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 05:40 2E0ILY 0.137550 +12 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 06:00 2E0ILY 0.137550 +12 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244
 2017-11-01 06:20 2E0ILY 0.137550 +12 0 IO82qv 0.2 M0DSZ IO82ls 31 244


 Is this now sorted? :) What was it if you don't mind me asking?



Tuesday, October 24, 2017, 7:57:58 PM, you wrote:

>
>
> Hello Jay
>
> There are 2 receivers, one a Kenwood R5000 and the other an
> SDRPlay RSP2. The former feeds a UHF link from shack to house, both
> ends running off 12V batteries with solar chargers. The R5000 can
> also run from 12V dc for the tests but not for long. The RSP2 gives
> the same results both in the shack and the house and powers from a
> USB input. This is the same with a desktop or a laptop running from
> it's own battery. The bandwidth filter is standard USB for the R5000 and 2kHz for the RSP2.
>
> This is where an independent assessment would be handy. There's not
> much point in posting the results but there are traces up to 500Hz
> away. I have only seen large sidebands on Mal's (G3KEV) but not usually.
>
> Hugh, M0DSZ












--
Best regards,
 Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com


--------------050101010603010605090608--