Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9QKBVqu028157 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 22:11:34 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e7oPc-0002VH-7T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:05:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e7oPI-0002V8-1D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:05:36 +0100 Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.26]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e7oPF-0002X0-5W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:05:34 +0100 Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([83.162.220.82]) by smtp-cloud9.xs4all.net with ESMTP id 7oPBecQzKnIXb7oPDeq7ti; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 22:05:31 +0200 From: "Roelof Bakker" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 22:05:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <59F24009.8218.DBA3E7@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> In-reply-to: <42e9950b-8ac9-4121-793b-3342e23571d5@n1bug.com> References: <4273a2ab-787c-d909-e7d0-d21db21ba18c@n1bug.com>, <6A5A0D655C1547DD91B4A70E43248F0D@DELL4>, <42e9950b-8ac9-4121-793b-3342e23571d5@n1bug.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.72.572) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGW09A8LiykreKM7dykSktIsGcVj7GhjiK+RNjKAi/dyJ7+y7Bsg+A8v68qvz5XGYR6GK8xz/3WvXUmCidcHlC9y2AB3gFSGhj6AovNmIWIIzP3CqYzC 9vQ0ZAT/xM4fABM7Bfop9D6jJFdeBT8wJh7P4n6vQxf3VkyIEcmXbtuY3eyEFwEK4TcHfcrp5+4yBw== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul, >>> However I have no idea how that would compare to the powdered iron T50-2 normally used in this circuit. <<< I have sucessfully used T50-1 and T68-1 powdered iron toroids. The optimum frequency range of type 1 covers 150 kHz - 3 MHz. I bought these from W8DIZ. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ce0e5a4ae990e5a63db3ab7aea21191b Subject: Re: LF: Monitoring 2190m WSPR Content-type: Multipart/Alternative; boundary="Alt-Boundary-7635.14394343" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --Alt-Boundary-7635.14394343 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Paul, >>> However I have no idea how that would compare to the powdered iron T50-2 normally used in this circuit. <<< I have sucessfully used T50-1 and T68-1 powdered iron toroids. The optimum frequency range of type 1 covers 150 kHz - 3 MHz. I bought these from W8DIZ. 73, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt --Alt-Boundary-7635.14394343 Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body

Paul,

>>>

However I have no idea how that would compare to the powdered iron T50-2 normally used in this

circuit.

<<<

I have sucessfully used T50-1 and T68-1 powdered iron toroids. The optimum frequency range of type 1 covers 150 kHz - 3 MHz. I bought these from W8DIZ.

73,

Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt

--Alt-Boundary-7635.14394343--