Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9GCjnkt017696 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:45:50 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e44hL-0003kx-1l for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:40:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e44hK-0003ko-Ey for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:40:46 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e44hH-0003yV-Or for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:40:45 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A27E020A51 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:40:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yFybP40wMz10H3 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:40:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59E4A8C0.4020707@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:40:32 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ec7c794b3-bff-66@webjas-vac136.srv.aolmail.net> <59D2BD65.4080909@posteo.de> <59D4B109.27652.1415B4FA@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <7737095b-edc9-8b5f-ebf5-2a6b2884d425@abelian.org> <59D7940D.7080102@posteo.de> <59DA4E78.7020804@posteo.de> <25d84b3d-2077-a3dc-426c-3f9b92940205@abelian.org> <59DB730D.4080803@posteo.de> <59DE3B9F.70705@posteo.de> <50b0a7b4-a6e6-398d-ea56-dbe66490d1b8@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <50b0a7b4-a6e6-398d-ea56-dbe66490d1b8@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, Probably you are the only one who is able to pick up the message that i will try to send soon. I'm not sure if your RX is running, i just give it a try. There has always been the question if it can make a significant difference, due to propagation effects, if the transmit frequency varies by just a few 10 Hz. Thus i'm now running an EbNaut transmission on 2 frequencies, sending the same message (parameters) and the same antenna current from the same antenna: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 0b36c952c26be93e626fe2fa1c93657f Subject: VLF: EbNaut on 2 frequencies Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010800010105020409010103" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010800010105020409010103 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Paul, Probably you are the only one who is able to pick up the message that i will try to send soon. I'm not sure if your RX is running, i just give it a try. There has always been the question if it can make a significant difference, due to propagation effects, if the transmit frequency varies by just a few 10 Hz. Thus i'm now running an EbNaut transmission on 2 frequencies, sending the same message (parameters) and the same antenna current from the same antenna: *f1 = 6430.005000 Hz f2 = 6510.005000 Hz Start time: 16.October.2017 13:00:00 UTC Symbol period: 15 s Characters: 2 CRC bits: 6 Coding 16K21A Duration: 2h32min Antenna current: 200 mA, on each frequency* I can repeat the message at night but let's give it a first try. Jacek asked for a similar test some time ago. He will need a night time signal i think. 73, Stefan --------------010800010105020409010103 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Paul,

Probably you are the only one who is able to pick up the message that i will try to send soon. I'm not sure if your RX is running, i just give it a try.
There has always been the question if it can make a significant difference, due to propagation effects, if the transmit frequency varies by just a few 10 Hz.
Thus i'm now running an EbNaut transmission on 2 frequencies, sending the same message (parameters) and the same antenna current from the same antenna:

f1 = 6430.005000 Hz
f2 = 6510.005000 Hz
Start time: 16.October.2017  13:00:00 UTC
Symbol period: 15 s
Characters: 2
CRC bits: 6
Coding 16K21A
Duration: 2h32min
Antenna current: 200 mA, on each frequency

I can repeat the message at night but let's give it a first try. Jacek asked for a similar test some time ago. He will need a night time signal i think.

73, Stefan


--------------010800010105020409010103--