Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v98GJsZe019748 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:19:57 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e1EC6-00055i-Tu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 17:12:46 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e1EC6-00055Z-JW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 17:12:46 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e1EC3-0007cQ-Rx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 17:12:45 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE20420BDD for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:12:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3y97gr3Tj4z10HR for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:12:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59DA4E78.7020804@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 18:12:40 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ec7c794b3-bff-66@webjas-vac136.srv.aolmail.net> <59D2BD65.4080909@posteo.de> <59D4B109.27652.1415B4FA@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <7737095b-edc9-8b5f-ebf5-2a6b2884d425@abelian.org> <59D7940D.7080102@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 06.10.2017 19:48, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > > Let's try to do the 100 character experiment > > this weekend. With some luck, just 2 days could > > work? > > OK. > > But next week I must take down the new E-field rx > to continue work. I have a lot to finish before > it can go 'live' properly. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: Re: VLF: 300 mA on 6470 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Am 06.10.2017 19:48, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > > Let's try to do the 100 character experiment > > this weekend. With some luck, just 2 days could > > work? > > OK. > > But next week I must take down the new E-field rx > to continue work. I have a lot to finish before > it can go 'live' properly. All right. Now the 2nd transmission of that message is completed. The QRN has been very low again today, at least here on the tree. I'm curious if that already works. But it will be critical i guess. If you can give me a first feedback before tomorrow morning, that would be nice. Otherwise i will start a 3rd transmission tomorrow. Meanwhile the 4th night transmission of the 16 character message has started. I tried Markus' stacking tool with the 3 days we have so far. The tool works on on a 32 bit machine but it works! Here it's not quite exciting because each indivdual file produces a 0 symbol errors decode. 3 * 0 remains 0, a first good sign :-) 73, Stefan