Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v8NEbHrh001703 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 16:37:18 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dvlTW-0005Zd-Ib for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:32:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dvlTV-0005ZU-Tq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:32:09 +0100 Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-5.server.virginmedia.net ([80.0.253.69]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dvlTR-0002U1-HG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:32:08 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([86.31.43.231]) by know-smtprelay-5-imp with bizsmtp id D2Y11w00P4zFP2m012Y3zE; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:32:04 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=ntlworld.com Result=Signature OK X-Originating-IP: [86.31.43.231] X-Authenticated-User: X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=XuEHQgx9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OMeJ2NchiI3V7dK0t+UK+Q==:117 a=OMeJ2NchiI3V7dK0t+UK+Q==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=wV9FcBFsAAAA:8 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=oCcaPWc0AAAA:8 a=wMF-fnVTL7lKKw00PCsA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=S9tSBiJD-_FMqjcyfT7e:22 a=wW_WBVUImv98JQXhvVPZ:22 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:32:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <59C67061.15051.28B4EECA@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-reply-to: References: <59C634ED.8252.27CCAAE3@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>, X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.72.572) Content-description: Mail message body DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ntlworld.com; s=meg.feb2017; t=1506177124; bh=b9OLMbNSpAvPSjzQvTSeCtsBCif22J2IWWzQP9QD6dI=; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Reply-to:In-reply-to:References; b=ld1f3lclxMgkh+xZGPgmdDRijOb1mqYtD3CZ8uG1yP+FB9QnNRj7VHfFdZmDTW1Gv +NGSIeK3lJG74wlNVFSV4uGTek97vUabObEXJgRK7CTrm7QIuQdKYnjhVcITwAyWv1 5Du3NTVzfbZ4A3kZwNzqvPXknEHemcbRNlntQaHVFqwt1jy6uqbJ4EtCROrDLVuMqk yo995xLDxbt0d/mzYIq8Xj5qSMx3L+UQWNEuT8bzR1+iyOossJYcuefLETDLbK8Oaq Wc7iVh71Ags6vLZVzBWKnePA11sdqon76DrYC9PJ7SbDlb/O+y+p9jPoH2qW1BdNAb BNRgtJjfnjv3A== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks to Andy (your pages included the important reference to Watts' VLF Radio Engineering) and to Dave for the pages from Watts. I now see how useful it was for Peter Dodd to digest the original data into simple figures for a typical amateur station. I will add this reference to the next edition of LF Today (if I am asked to do one!) and to the LF chapter of the Radio Communication Handbook. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 195b836cb7437e99aa05107459888659 Subject: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: Effective antenna height? Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Thanks to Andy (your pages included the important reference to Watts' VLF Radio Engineering) and to Dave for the pages from Watts. I now see how useful it was for Peter Dodd to digest the original data into simple figures for a typical amateur station. I will add this reference to the next edition of LF Today (if I am asked to do one!) and to the LF chapter of the Radio Communication Handbook. Mike, G3XDV ========== > I have the very book in front of me. The LF Source Book > > There is a littel bit of justification for those values, but not much. > They seem to be experimental Photo of the two pages covering LF > Verticals can be found here > > http://www.g4jnt.com/DropF/lfsourcebookpg210.jpg > > http://www.g4jnt.com/DropF/lfsourcebookpg211.jpg > > Andy G4JNT > > > > On 23 September 2017 at 11:18, Mike Dennison > wrote: > > > Knowing the effective height of a Marconi antenna is essential in > > the calculation of radiated power /antenna efficiency at LF/MF. The > > formula for this includes figures for the capacitance to ground of > > the vertical and horizontal wires. The result being somewhere > > between 50% and 100% of the actual height. > > > > As long as I have been interested in LF - over 20 years - I have > > seen (and used) a figure of 5pF/m for the capacitance of the > > horizontal wire and 6pF/m for the vertical wire. However, I have > > recently been asked how this figure originated, and must admit that > > I don't remember. Was it amateur experimentation, or a professional > > source such as the Admiralty Handbook? The very first amateur UK LF > > book, a slim spiral bound volume by Peter Dodd, may have the answer > > but I don't have a copy. Peter's bigger follow-up book, The Low > > Frequency Experiemnter's Handbook, published in 2000, already takes > > these figures as understood. > > > > Can anyone help, please? > > > > Mike, G3XDV > > ========== > > > > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > http://www.avg.com >