Message-ID: <59B519E7.5030008@posteo.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 12:54:31 +0200
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <59B3B9A6.25899.51511DA@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <59B3B9A6.25899.51511DA@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: LF: To all VLF transmitters
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

Hi Mike,

All right. After the currently running experiment i'll run some carrier 
or maybe DFCW-60000. I'll announce it a few days before.
Make sure a 47 uHz window is running to that time, maybe two 
Spectrograms, one showing 8270 Hz, the other one showing ALPHA F1, 
11904.7619 Hz.
Locking to GBZ or GQD or 1 PPS is a requirement! Maybe Eddie can help 
you if necessary.

73, Stefan

Am 09.09.2017 11:51, schrieb Mike Dennison:
> It is really interesting to follow the activities of those using the
> extremely challenging frequencies below 10kHz, but can I make a plea
> for anyone testing on VLF to give a day or two notice when announcing
> transmissions. Not everyone has a permanent VLF receiving set-up.
>
> I am happy to run a VLF receiver but to do so I must stop my 136kHz
> activities, retune the antenna (in daylight), and set up an extremely
> slow spectrogram which will take several hours to show enough
> background noise to prove that it is working.
>
> There must be other stations who would like to join in with the tests
> but are in the same position as me. Sometimes, by the time the
> spectrogram displays anything useful the transmission has stopped or,
> worse, the transmitting station does not say when he has stopped
> transmitting.
>
> Thanks.
> Mike, G3XDV
> ==========
>
>
>
>
>
>