From: "Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 22:09:47 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <59580F9B.10711.22AF9C4@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>
In-reply-to: <CAA8k23Tk0Bag=AXaZiT1J5noEaq6z9a3O+dmSarw8hS9+WLJPA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA8k23Tk0Bag=AXaZiT1J5noEaq6z9a3O+dmSarw8hS9+WLJPA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-description: Mail message body
Subject: Re: LF: 20 Years of QRSS
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

I was involved in the naming of "QRSS". It is simply QRS (slow CW) 
but the extra 'S' indicates "very", using the same syntax as "QRPP" 
meaning "very QRP".

It is hard to imagine now what a breakthrough Andy and Peter's 
experiments were, communicating over what were unheard of distances 
in those days. 

My first received QRSS involved a rather fast spectrogram (waterfall) 
and a stopwatch as it scrolled off the screen.

I believe Andy and I had the first two-way QRSS QSO, and I certainly 
had the first international QRSS contact, with ON7YD - also a 
UK-Belgium first.

Perhaps we should have a QRSS weekend on Fri/Sat/Sun 14/15/16 July? 
Any takers?

Mike, G3XDV
==========


> Looking back in my logbook I see on the 12 July 1997 that I made a
> transmission on 73kHz that was received by G3PLX 393km away in a
> bandwidth of a few tens of milli-Hz. Peter was using the new fangled
> DSP stuff in a Motorola DSP card, to display the narrowband filtered
> signal on a waterfall display.
> 
> I was radiating perhaps 5 - 10 milliwatts ERP (from a 200W
> transmitter)
> 
> No information was exchanged that day, just confirmation of the
> carrier being switched on or off using the telephone as a back link.  
> Peter suggested I write some software to generate very slow CW to key
> the transmitter and send it to him.
> 
> On 27 July He received the first SLOWCW signal from me with positive
> ID of the callsign, sent according to my logbook notes with 100s dots
> between 0400 to 0718 UTC.    We then did the same again for several
> nights running, varying the dot speed .   This completely smashed the
> one-way distance record for the 73kHz band.   There were several at
> the time who said "its not real amateur radio, it's computers talking"
>  but those voices were soon silenced.
> 
> Others wrote software to generate the keying and suddenly everyone
> started using SLOWCW which for some unfathomable reason started to be
> called QRSS (why ?)
> 
> Now 20 years later, it still seems to be widely used, albeit with a
> few variations like DFCW to speed up exchanges.
> 
> Andy  G4JNT
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
>