Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v52EQAR6013777 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:26:12 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dGnSR-0002J0-QC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 15:21:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dGnSR-0002Ir-6l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 15:21:43 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dGnSO-000132-Ak for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 15:21:41 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BAB120BB1 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:21:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3wfRGm72F3zyxY for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 16:21:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59317470.9000303@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:21:36 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15c691384e7.marcocadeddu@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <15c691384e7.marcocadeddu@tin.it> X-Scan-Signature: 77d68ebd44814a6def4d7158b7296e78 Subject: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11859 Hi Marco, Chris, Greetings from the lower end of the spectrum. It is quite silent down here, no contests, no band plans, not even complaints about key clicks!!!! (so relaxing), no pile ups, just the nature is speaking to me from time to time. And ZEVS is whispering but i can't hear it so far. I'm envious, up on the microwaves with just a few km of wavelength you have so much bandwidth, you can tune down by 1 kHz and more, whereas i would crash into the DC wall when attempting to try that. Also your coils are so small, the antenna current so high, the voltages so low, the ERP so high, and there are so many people daily. However my phase is so stable down here and so reproducable :-) So i can can talk very slowly or say just one word per day. And i'm diving below the switch mode power supply QRM and inbetween the mains hum :-) It all has its pros and cons. Anyway we have a nice hobby on the real low frequencies. I'll visit you again in the near future on 137 kHz. Maybe we can try something like JT9 or QRSS? 73, Stefan Am 02.06.2017 15:51, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it: > Hello Chris, > > yes I'm testing into a dummy load and getting troubles trepassing the > 15kmW (thousend of mW) limit!!! > I drive with a reasonable waveform both the qrp TX and > medium power TX (and now the halfbridge tx) with an IXDD614 chip. > > Will resist still in this microwaves area waiting that the oter folks > go to DC ;-))) > > CU Marco > > ----Messaggio originale---- > Da: dead.fets@gmail.com > Data: 2-giu-2017 15.14 > A: > Ogg: Re: R: LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived... > > Hello Marco, > > My loading coil drifts as it warms up, but that's only when a kW or so > is run, not at low power. But I think you are testing into a dummy > load? I also had a poor drain waveform on one side of my push pull > Class "D", that was only cured by changing one of the 2 FET's (that > tested fine out of circuit). We "microwavers" are old school now > that > people are moving to DC toggled every hour or so ;) > > > > Friday, June 2, 2017, 2:00:07 PM, you wrote: > > >> Hi Alan, >> > >> and thanks for joining :-) >> it's hard to believe at this stage that is correct to speak of "high >> currents".. >> The PA is an half bridge like >> Andy's 700W but now I'm testing at low voltage: I see these problem >> trepassing the 30Vdc supply level (and power is about 15W).. >> Anyway will try with the "pulse rated caps" you suggested just in >> > case > >> my "low current" "low tension" ideas are wrong. >> 73 Marco >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >