Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v3FCsir8023513 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:54:45 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1czNB6-0005Tu-UM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:51:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1czNB6-0005Tl-EZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:51:48 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1czNB3-0005PS-Kc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:51:47 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6E720BB4 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:51:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3w4vYC43bTz106j for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:51:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <58F2175F.9040000@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 14:51:43 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <58EEA12A.7010804@posteo.de> <15b6cbc9ef4-6484-1b121@webprd-a96.mail.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <15b6cbc9ef4-6484-1b121@webprd-a96.mail.aol.com> X-Scan-Signature: 7c7a1907d3a7d57b28660e5fb4c32107 Subject: Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000307040507090809080603" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11313 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000307040507090809080603 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus, A big signal here, 16 dB SNR in 424 uHz. That gives an impression how well you could see me if there would be no local QRM on your side... 73, Stefan Am 14.04.2017 15:52, schrieb Markus Vester: > Looks like Stefan's carrier was back on 6470.005 today from 8:40 to > 13:40 UT. > > I have stacked a few coils again, and since 13:30 I'm running a > carrier on 6469.9975 Hz with 0.21 A. Trying to see whether it shows > up on the one of the 6470 spectrograms in Heidelberg or Amberg. > > Best 73, > Markus > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: DK7FC > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Mi, 12. Apr 2017 23:51 > Betreff: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz > > Hello dear friends of the Very Low Frequencies, > > Now i'm down on 6470 Hz again. So far the antenna current is limited > by the PA, somehow, obviously one of the transformers does not > transfer enough current on this frequency. The antenna current is *460 > mA*. The actual goal is to get 500 mA, maybe 540 mA. > The carrier is on the air *since 20:42 UTC on 6470.005 Hz*. > Relative to my 8270 Hz signal, this one is 7.8 dB weaker. But relative > to my last experiments on 6470 Hz, now the signal is 6.2 dB stronger. > The carrier will run several hours, protected to 450 mA. > > If all works well, i will run an EbNaut message tomorrow evening. > > Reports welcome. > > 73, Stefan > > --------------000307040507090809080603 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus,

A big signal here, 16 dB SNR in 424 uHz. That gives an impression how well you could see me if there would be no local QRM on your side...
73, Stefan

Am 14.04.2017 15:52, schrieb Markus Vester:
Looks like Stefan's carrier was back on 6470.005 today from 8:40 to 13:40 UT.

I have stacked a few coils again, and since 13:30 I'm running a carrier on 6469.9975 Hz with 0.21 A. Trying to see whether it shows up on the one of the 6470 spectrograms in Heidelberg or Amberg.

Best 73,
Markus   


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mi, 12. Apr 2017 23:51
Betreff: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz

Hello dear friends of the Very Low Frequencies,

Now i'm down on 6470 Hz again. So far the antenna current is limited by the PA, somehow, obviously one of the transformers does not transfer enough current on this frequency. The antenna current is 460 mA. The actual goal is to get 500 mA, maybe 540 mA.
The carrier is on the air since 20:42 UTC on 6470.005 Hz.
Relative to my 8270 Hz signal, this one is 7.8 dB weaker. But relative to my last experiments on 6470 Hz, now the signal is 6.2 dB stronger.
The carrier will run several hours, protected to 450 mA.

If all works well, i will run an EbNaut message tomorrow evening.

Reports welcome.

73, Stefan


--------------000307040507090809080603--