Message-ID: <58ECC8A4.9070100@posteo.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:14:28 +0200
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <15b5ce90477-1bd1-11b95@webprd-m41.mail.aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <15b5ce90477-1bd1-11b95@webprd-m41.mail.aol.com>
Subject: Re: VLF: DFCW-6000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------010708070903060001070908"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010708070903060001070908
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Markus,

The spectrograms are nice, thanks. Good to train the local human analog 
decoder a bit, by interpreting elements buried in the noise :-)

73, Stefan

Am 11.04.2017 14:07, schrieb Markus Vester:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> ...maybe not exactly what you'd call a "well looking spectrogram", 
> but the message is mostly visible in Nuernberg. Note that some desense 
> from local LF transmissions occurred during parts of the "K" and "7".
>
> The DL0AO receiver in Amberg also picked up some parts of the signal 
> on the still improvised long-wire antenna, somewhat better after 
> removing one particular local noise source on Monday morning.
>
> Note that at our distances (~ 180 and 230 km), the signal was 
> significantly stronger during the night, presumably due to less 
> unfavourable groundwave vs skywave phasing.  Thus for receivers sites 
> like ours which are dominated by local QRM, night time seems to be the 
> best choice. On the other hand, the situation may be reversed at quiet 
> sites which can make full use of lower daytime noise levels.
>
> Best 73, and thanks for the signal,
>
> Markus  (DF6NM)
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
> Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
> An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Verschickt: Mo, 10. Apr 2017 16:30
> Betreff: Re: VLF: DFCW-6000
>
> Hi Eddie, Paul, Jacek, VLF,
>
> Thanks for watching. I already saw the poor propagation during the first
> element and later the spectrogram slip. So it looks like Paul and Jacek
> could be the only watching stations who can produce a well looking
> spectrogram in the end...
> Meanwhile the 7 is completed :-)
> 73, Stefan
> ...

--------------010708070903060001070908
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Markus, <br>
<br>
The spectrograms are nice, thanks. Good to train the local human analog
decoder a bit, by interpreting elements buried in the noise :-)<br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
Am 11.04.2017 14:07, schrieb Markus Vester:
<blockquote cite="mid:15b5ce90477-1bd1-11b95@webprd-m41.mail.aol.com"
 type="cite">
  <div
 style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; color: black;">
  <div
 style="color: black; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">Hi
Stefan,<br>
  <br>
...maybe not exactly what you'd call a "well looking spectrogram",
but the message is mostly visible in Nuernberg. Note that some desense
from local LF transmissions occurred during parts of the "K" and "7".<br>
  <br>
The DL0AO receiver in Amberg also picked up some parts of the signal on
the still improvised long-wire antenna, somewhat better after
removing one particular local noise source on Monday morning.<br>
 <br>
Note that at our distances (~ 180 and 230 km), the signal was
significantly stronger during the night, presumably due to less
unfavourable groundwave vs skywave phasing.  Thus for receivers sites
like ours which are dominated by local QRM, night time seems to be the
best choice. On the other hand, the situation may be reversed at quiet
sites which can make full use of lower daytime noise levels.<br>
  <br>
Best 73, and thanks for the signal,<br>
  <br>
Markus  (DF6NM)<br>
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- <br>
Von: DK7FC <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:selberdenken@posteo.de">&lt;selberdenken@posteo.de&gt;</a><br>
An: rsgb_lf_group <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">&lt;rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org&gt;</a><br>
Verschickt: Mo, 10. Apr 2017 16:30<br>
Betreff: Re: VLF: DFCW-6000<br>
  <br>
  </div>
Hi Eddie, Paul, Jacek, VLF,<br>
  <br>
Thanks for watching. I already saw the poor propagation during the
first <br>
element and later the spectrogram slip. So it looks like Paul and Jacek
  <br>
could be the only watching stations who can produce a well looking <br>
spectrogram in the end...<br>
Meanwhile the 7 is completed :-)<br>
73, Stefan<br>
...</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------010708070903060001070908--