Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v2ACtalB023194
	for <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:55:37 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1cmK1b-0000gC-OX
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:52:03 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1cmK1b-0000fy-FS
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:52:03 +0000
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <selberdenken@posteo.de>)
	id 1cmK1Y-0003sM-Pd
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:52:02 +0000
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
	by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BDF2099B
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:52:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3vfnG80g7YzyrG
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:52:00 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <58C2A16F.6070506@posteo.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:51:59 +0100
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <15ab5924c85-6837-1eec0@webprd-a101.mail.aol.com> <a71d9e83-04e9-8e4f-aa29-59a9cd4b4fc1@psk31.plus.com> <6f50fc19-4302-204c-d14f-deb705f76601@freenet.de>
In-Reply-To: <6f50fc19-4302-204c-d14f-deb705f76601@freenet.de>
X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850
Subject: Re: VLF: SpecLab old versions
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75
Status: RO
X-Status: A
X-Keywords:                
X-UID: 10823

Hi Wolf,

Will you hate is so much, one day, that you decide to build a Linux 
version of SL? That would be a great step for a few of us to finally 
leave it, the "OS". Politics! Autarkie, and open source stuff (instead 
of spyware) for a modern and free world, just what we need. :-)

73, Stefan

Am 10.03.2017 13:36, schrieb Wolfgang BĂźscher:
> Hi Eddie and all,
>
> If SL is unable to load the colour palette files, you should try 
> installing it in a folder *outside* the usual 'programs'-thingy in 
> windows. Quite likely the hyper-nervous 'operating system' doesn't 
> grant file access to that folder, and all sub-folders.
>
> Anyway, I've got a slow old PC where I installed windoze 10. I still 
> hate it (the "OS", not the PC) but maybe at given time, I will install 
> the C compiler there and try to debug it. I cannot promise anything 
> yet, because I am quite fed up with windows at the moment.
>
> Cheers,
>   Wolf DL4YHF .
>
> Am 10.03.2017 um 09:57 schrieb g3zjo:
>> On 10/03/2017 00:15, Markus Vester wrote:
>>> those version and build numbers look odd to me, are you sure you've 
>>> got them right?
>>
>> No :-)
>>
>> I should remember never to trust my memory. Correction V2.92 b02 is 
>> the newest, I was advised to try V2.90 b20, I only had V2.90 b16 
>> available so stepped back to that.
>> It was my last email late last night, excuses, excuses. I could have 
>> checked because they are both on this Laptop also. I have considered 
>> V2.92 b02 to be flaky on display from my first use, I mentioned it to 
>> Stefan. I had to start afresh with all my .config files it just 
>> didn't like my old ones.
>> Something not seen before but happens now on both releases on both 
>> machines is, constant messages on start up of "can't find the 
>> Pallete" ie Sunrise, the default. Do you see this? I wonder if it 
>> indicates that the two versions are using different locations to 
>> store display information. I know a lot of set up information is 
>> stored in memory.
>>
>> 73 Eddie G3ZJO
>>
>
>