Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v2ACtalB023194 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:55:37 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cmK1b-0000gC-OX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:52:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cmK1b-0000fy-FS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:52:03 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1cmK1Y-0003sM-Pd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:52:02 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BDF2099B for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:52:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3vfnG80g7YzyrG for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:52:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <58C2A16F.6070506@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:51:59 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ab5924c85-6837-1eec0@webprd-a101.mail.aol.com> <6f50fc19-4302-204c-d14f-deb705f76601@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <6f50fc19-4302-204c-d14f-deb705f76601@freenet.de> X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Subject: Re: VLF: SpecLab old versions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: A X-Keywords: X-UID: 10823 Hi Wolf, Will you hate is so much, one day, that you decide to build a Linux version of SL? That would be a great step for a few of us to finally leave it, the "OS". Politics! Autarkie, and open source stuff (instead of spyware) for a modern and free world, just what we need. :-) 73, Stefan Am 10.03.2017 13:36, schrieb Wolfgang Büscher: > Hi Eddie and all, > > If SL is unable to load the colour palette files, you should try > installing it in a folder *outside* the usual 'programs'-thingy in > windows. Quite likely the hyper-nervous 'operating system' doesn't > grant file access to that folder, and all sub-folders. > > Anyway, I've got a slow old PC where I installed windoze 10. I still > hate it (the "OS", not the PC) but maybe at given time, I will install > the C compiler there and try to debug it. I cannot promise anything > yet, because I am quite fed up with windows at the moment. > > Cheers, > Wolf DL4YHF . > > Am 10.03.2017 um 09:57 schrieb g3zjo: >> On 10/03/2017 00:15, Markus Vester wrote: >>> those version and build numbers look odd to me, are you sure you've >>> got them right? >> >> No :-) >> >> I should remember never to trust my memory. Correction V2.92 b02 is >> the newest, I was advised to try V2.90 b20, I only had V2.90 b16 >> available so stepped back to that. >> It was my last email late last night, excuses, excuses. I could have >> checked because they are both on this Laptop also. I have considered >> V2.92 b02 to be flaky on display from my first use, I mentioned it to >> Stefan. I had to start afresh with all my .config files it just >> didn't like my old ones. >> Something not seen before but happens now on both releases on both >> machines is, constant messages on start up of "can't find the >> Pallete" ie Sunrise, the default. Do you see this? I wonder if it >> indicates that the two versions are using different locations to >> store display information. I know a lot of set up information is >> stored in memory. >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> > >