Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v1FJBHrC001591 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:11:18 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ce4rT-0000Cx-45 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:03:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ce4rR-0000Co-NB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:03:29 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1ce4rN-0002Xf-Gj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:03:28 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 718F520852 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:03:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3vNpbH6rq7z105y for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:03:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <58A4A5FB.7040000@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:03:23 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15a42e15605-3718-97d8@webprd-a49.mail.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <15a42e15605-3718-97d8@webprd-a49.mail.aol.com> X-Scan-Signature: 420019f4991fbaa4f653703c21f48617 Subject: Re: VLF: Antenna switching Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040204080501010801010905" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10601 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040204080501010801010905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus, I know!! And you are not the only one who doesn't like NMEA. I like it however :-) In my opinion, the favoured solution would be to build up a VLF RX system in a quiet location nr Nürnberg! :-) 73, Stefan PS: There was a bug in the script, now solved. Am 15.02.2017 18:45, schrieb Markus Vester: > Hmmm Stefan, if unannounced transmissions can buy me precious > East-West antenna time, I guess I should revert to surprise operations > as well ;-)) In my opinion, the favoured solution would be to kick out > NMEA and listen on both antennas simultaneously, with only 1pps > superimposed on the right channel. > > Best 73, > Markus > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: DK7FC > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Mi, 15. Feb 2017 15:21 > Betreff: VLF: Antenna switching > > Hello Markus, VLF, > > My antenna switch works now. I wrote a small script (just my level of > skills, while loops and so on ;-) ) that allows tto switch from the > north-south loop over to the east-west loop to a certain time and then > back to another time. > The script is now tested the first time, i switched to EW since 14 UTC > and will be back on NS at 16 UTC. You can see the difference at > http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html > So, Markus, if you want to try a short EbNaut transmission soon in the > morning, just tell me the day before, then i can switch the antenna to > you just during the start of your transmission, while i'm still > sleeping. And then back into Uwes direction, who prefers unannounced > transmissions :-) > I als removed the grounding on the relay pin of the unused antenna, > which caused a coupling between the loops. Now it all should work well... > > It opens new playing fields, e.g. testing an alternative E field antenna > on the second input. That will be a better choice for the 970 Hz > experiments... > > 73, Stefan > > --------------040204080501010801010905 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus,

I know!! And you are not the only one who doesn't like NMEA. I like it however :-)
In my opinion, the favoured solution would be to build up a VLF RX system in a quiet location nr Nürnberg! :-)

73, Stefan

PS: There was a bug in the script, now solved.

Am 15.02.2017 18:45, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hmmm Stefan, if unannounced transmissions can buy me precious East-West antenna time, I guess I should revert to surprise operations as well ;-)) In my opinion, the favoured solution would be to kick out NMEA and listen on both antennas simultaneously, with only 1pps superimposed on the right channel.

Best 73,
Markus
  

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Mi, 15. Feb 2017 15:21
Betreff: VLF: Antenna switching

Hello Markus, VLF,

My antenna switch works now. I wrote a small script (just my level of
skills, while loops and so on ;-) ) that allows tto switch from the
north-south loop over to the east-west loop to a certain time and then
back to another time.
The script is now tested the first time, i switched to EW since 14 UTC
and will be back on NS at 16 UTC. You can see the difference at
http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html
So, Markus, if you want to try a short EbNaut transmission soon in the
morning, just tell me the day before, then i can switch the antenna to
you just during the start of your transmission, while i'm still
sleeping. And then back into Uwes direction, who prefers unannounced
transmissions :-)
I als removed the grounding on the relay pin of the unused antenna,
which caused a coupling between the loops. Now it all should work well...

It opens new playing fields, e.g. testing an alternative E field antenna
on the second input. That will be a better choice for the 970 Hz
experiments...

73, Stefan


--------------040204080501010801010905--