Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v13DrVdj020846 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:53:32 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cZeFn-0004Nf-7R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:50:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cZeFm-0004NS-UP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:50:18 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cZeFV-00061b-2L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:50:17 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF2720A45 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:50:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3vFJCD0DQVz106P for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:50:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <58948A87.3000607@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:49:59 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <159c6d4aa99-2cc9-11356@webprd-m36.mail.aol.com> <5884E0D8.1090102@abelian.org> <5885FBEE.3060408@posteo.de> <58861BDF.8010605@posteo.de> <58875792.7020302@posteo.de> <58879804.7010301@abelian.org> <5887ACEB.2000207@posteo.de> <5888EEDA.6070308@abelian.org> <588DE1EE.3050408@posteo.de> <588E25B1.8010009@abelian.org> <0af401d27d92$a83d69e0$f8b83da0$@comcast.net> <0b7201d27e1c$3df842f0$b9e8c8d0$@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: Re: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10467 Hi Paul, i don't have much time on the weekend i guess. Will spend the time in Mannheim where the YL lives. I can steer the TX via smartphone and Teamviewer though (like done in France). Next week we can try 4.3x kHz. Thus i'm staying on 2970 Hz over the weekend. Maybe you can extract something then, or from Renatos stream. Now, a short trip to the tree, adding a relay to be able to switch between the 2 VLF loops... 73, Stefan Am 03.02.2017 14:37, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > I'm surprised at the depth of the dips in the FDTD plots, > is the amplitude scale correct? > > The FDTD results are consistent with my complete inability to > detect anything of the 2970 Hz signal here, whereas 5170 Hz > is quite easy to receive. > > It also suggests it would still not work at 2570 Hz but we > should get a result at 4390 Hz. > > Currently, still nothing from Stefan's 2970 carrier in 48 hours, > 5.8uHz bandwidth down to 0.01 fT. Not the slightest hint of > signal. > > Stefan, maybe you want to try a higher frequency? 4390 not > so good here but the range 4370 to 4380 is ok, 4378 looks > best of all. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >