DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=TEuzTBdE0D+46COQ8NY5QLWrwRtT2sfdo4hflAnrpmwPTo1VwpdcVxGIh6ayt4Wk6dOXhqEAT0cRvQJwTaYZF67CdGnbwWMcxZYXMDILMeNLt9m/2uxulEclpjE1jBD6FKqprhc/+vTZ2ZK4jigsGajY7BqZFGmiJzNuEbGghqw=;
Message-ID: <585695.91431.qm@web28105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 05:29:26 -0800 (PST)
From: M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <9afca2641003061120o7d50442ax1348688d91fa3c04@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web access?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-32340774-1267968566=:91431"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--0-32340774-1267968566=:91431
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Roger and group
=A0
I suggested the use of either Yahoo or the Google eqiv=A0years ago for the=
 very reasons you have listed Roger, An attempt was made with the Google=
 500kHz UK group. But the advantage seem to lost on most of the RSGB thing=
y users.
=A0
A good suggestion Roger I support it. However a split now probably won't=
 work. The Dead Hand of you know who?

73 es GL petefmt

--- On Sat, 6/3/10, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:


From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
Subject: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives and web acc=
ess?
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Saturday, 6 March, 2010, 19:20


Although I enjoy this group it would be much better if it was a Yahoo Grou=
p. Why?


Messages can be read on-line if preferred and it is not necessary to downl=
oad messages to a mail programme.
Files could be stored - useful for circuits, written reports, pdf document=
s etc

Photos could be stored on the group website (massive 100GB storage!)

All messages are archived and can be searched easily, even years later

Messages can be filtered/moderated if needed and offenders banned
Databases can be created
Pages of useful links can be created
Moderation is easy and can be done by several individuals.

Messages can still be received as emails if preferred.
Polls can be created
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 etc etc

I have run a couple of Yahoo Groups now for several years (Miracle Whip an=
d VHFam) and there have been absolutely no problems at all. The first has=
 over 1100 members and the second around 200.

So, my question is why don't we set one up and all migrate? I think everyo=
ne would benefit.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--=20

http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM
G3XBM =A0 =A0GQRP 1678 =A0 =A0 =A0ISWL G11088



     =20

--0-32340774-1267968566=:91431
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D=
"top" style=3D"font: inherit;"><DIV>Hi Roger and group</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I suggested the use of either Yahoo or the Google eqiv&nbsp;years ago=
 for the very reasons you have listed Roger, An attempt was made with the=
 Google 500kHz UK group. But the advantage seem to lost on most of the RSG=
B thingy users.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>A good suggestion Roger I support it. However a split now probably wo=
n't work. The Dead Hand of you know who?<BR><BR>73 es GL petefmt<BR><BR>--=
- On <B>Sat, 6/3/10, Roger Lapthorn <I>&lt;rogerlapthorn@gmail.com&gt;</I>=
</B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT:=
 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><BR>From: Roger Lapthorn &lt;rogerlapthorn@gmail.c=
om&gt;<BR>Subject: LF: Why is this group not a Yahoo group with archives=
 and web access?<BR>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org<BR>Date: Saturday, 6=
 March, 2010, 19:20<BR><BR>
<DIV id=3Dyiv1069816614>Although I enjoy this group it would be much bette=
r if it was a Yahoo Group. Why?<BR>
<OL>
<LI>Messages can be read on-line if preferred and it is not necessary to=
 download messages to a mail programme.</LI>
<LI>Files could be stored - useful for circuits, written reports, pdf docu=
ments etc<BR></LI>
<LI>Photos could be stored on the group website (massive 100GB storage!)<B=
R></LI>
<LI>All messages are archived and can be searched easily, even years later=
<BR></LI>
<LI>Messages can be filtered/moderated if needed and offenders banned</LI>
<LI>Databases can be created</LI>
<LI>Pages of useful links can be created</LI>
<LI>Moderation is easy and can be done by several individuals.<BR></LI>
<LI>Messages can still be received as emails if preferred.</LI>
<LI>Polls can be created<BR></LI></OL>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; etc=
 etc<BR><BR>I have run a couple of Yahoo Groups now for several years (Mir=
acle Whip and VHFam) and there have been absolutely no problems at all. Th=
e first has over 1100 members and the second around 200.<BR><BR>So, my que=
stion is why don't we set one up and all migrate? I think everyone would=
 benefit.<BR><BR>73s<BR>Roger G3XBM<BR><BR>-- <BR><BR><A href=3D"http://g3=
xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/" rel=3Dnofollow target=3D_blank>http://g3xbm-qrp.blo=
gspot.com/</A><BR><A href=3D"http://www.g3xbm.co.uk/" rel=3Dnofollow targe=
t=3D_blank>http://www.g3xbm.co.uk</A><BR><A href=3D"http://www.youtube.com=
/user/G3XBM" rel=3Dnofollow target=3D_blank>http://www.youtube.com/user/G3=
XBM</A><BR>G3XBM &nbsp; &nbsp;GQRP 1678 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ISWL G11088<BR=
></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table><br>



     =20

--0-32340774-1267968566=:91431--