Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mailn.lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id uB4C8CPm004381 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 13:08:13 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cDVXp-0002nf-8l for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 12:05:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cDVXo-0002nW-SY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 12:05:24 +0000 Received: from mail.webgo24-server11.de ([37.17.224.224]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cDVXm-0003D6-9A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 12:05:23 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (xdsl-78-35-137-14.netcologne.de [78.35.137.14]) by mail.webgo24-server11.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CCA49A606F0 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 13:05:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <58440681.4040804@vsas.de> Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 13:05:21 +0100 From: Vincent Stallbaum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <38F665123BD04C58B08CF78A0AABB747@malcoHP> <5842FA52.7080604@posteo.de> <6E85CA2FD058424EA9C210FA5A46324B@PCPMF>,<58431CA1.40809@vsas.de> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D87F120@servigilant.vigilant.local> <1A0F9D0A9AA34763A3E667502E0030D5@SV8CS> <556FFEC1688540ABA4FC025EF28020F2@PCPMF> In-Reply-To: <556FFEC1688540ABA4FC025EF28020F2@PCPMF> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 161204-0, 04.12.2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Signature: 29f208b223fe7a2cb359508e38e2ea2d Subject: Re: LF: De F6CNI : CW QSO PARTY report Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050908070603070306060008" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9688 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050908070603070306060008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all, thank you for participating in CW party. I think I have to improve my station. A few dB more RX & TX would be fine for CW-mode. EA5DOM 579 and PA0LCE 449 has been heard without QSO nr Cologne ... vy73 Vinny, DL6II Am 04.12.2016 09:54, schrieb F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB: > HI all. > For info, my short report about the CW QSO PARTY. I was only QRV > receiving CW, no transmitting. I was listening during 2 periods, each > of about 1 hour 1/2 long. > RX FT1000MP full options (a fantastic CW RX on LF/MF) and as RX > antenna a vertical tube 9.5 m high, base loaded with a L circuit : > serial 1.1 mH coil and 4700 pF capacitor in parallel coaxial side. > The window 472 – 475 kHz band was QRN quiet, but high QRM due to the > Poland NDB and his 2 x side AF modulations, which is coming here 589. > The segment 474.3 to 475.4 kHz is very clear and for me the best > choice for CW, but nobody was using it... The segment 472 – 472.7 is > also clear but that is a pity to heard some high power station staying > long time on the QRG and calling and calling many and many CQ without > having the slightest consideration or the politeness for the others. > I heard 16 stations in 7 DXCC countries. > The first QSO I heard was DJ6CB / G3YXM at 1657 TU. > The strongest and best report 599+ to EA5DOM calling some CQ beginning > at 1822 TU. Some stations was calling him but no QSO. Later he worked > DK7FC. > Also strong 599 report to DK7FC who had also at times some problems to > copy QRP station calling him. > I did not copy my old friend Jeff F6BWO, because I was not listenint > at his QRV time. > 73 @++ Andy. --------------050908070603070306060008 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi all,

thank you for participating in CW party.

I think I have to improve my station. A few dB more RX & TX would be fine for CW-mode.

EA5DOM 579 and PA0LCE 449 has been heard without QSO nr Cologne ...


vy73
Vinny, DL6II


Am 04.12.2016 09:54, schrieb F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB:
 
HI all.
 
For info, my short report about the CW QSO PARTY. I was only QRV receiving CW, no transmitting. I was listening during 2 periods, each of about 1 hour 1/2 long.
 
RX FT1000MP full options (a fantastic CW RX on LF/MF) and as RX antenna a vertical tube 9.5 m high, base loaded with a L circuit : serial 1.1 mH coil and 4700 pF capacitor in parallel coaxial side.
 
The window 472 – 475 kHz band was QRN quiet, but high QRM due to the Poland NDB and his 2 x side AF modulations, which is coming here 589. The segment 474.3 to 475.4 kHz is very clear and for me the best choice for CW, but nobody was using it... The segment 472 – 472.7 is also clear but that is a pity to heard some high power station staying long time on the QRG and calling and calling many and many CQ without having the slightest consideration or the politeness for the others.
 
I heard 16 stations in 7 DXCC countries.
 
The first QSO I heard was DJ6CB / G3YXM at 1657 TU.
 
The strongest and best report 599+ to EA5DOM calling some CQ beginning at 1822 TU. Some stations was calling him but no QSO. Later he worked DK7FC.
 
Also strong 599 report to DK7FC who had also at times some problems to copy QRP station calling him.
 
I did not copy my old friend Jeff F6BWO, because I was not listenint at his QRV time.
 
73 @++ Andy.
 
 
 
 
 

--------------050908070603070306060008--