Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id uAAGqf8D008830 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:52:41 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1c4sVB-0006Ix-KZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:47:01 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1c4sVA-0006Io-OM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:47:00 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c4sV8-0006q0-2V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:46:59 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 941FE209D8 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:46:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3tF88Y3Ppvz105k for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:46:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5824A47D.3060108@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:46:53 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <154c32c4dba-373a-24653@webprd-m58.mail.aol.com> <573CAF79.9040701@abelian.org> <573CBBF0.4030701@posteo.de> <573E5907.6020107@posteo.de> <573EA094.3040205@abelian.org> <573EF90F.1080201@posteo.de> <573FC4DA.3080107@abelian.org> <5740842D.3030000@posteo.de> <5744FA27.6010703@posteo.de> <57F56531.3060205@posteo.de> <5817DE39.9010506@posteo.de> <5818DDAB.7000804@abelian.org> <5819E3AA.3020906@posteo.de> <581A452F.6060506@abelian.org> <581A4BC6.9030106@abelian.org> <581A541E.9050406@abelian.org> <581A8098.8050909@posteo.de> <581C3027.8050003@abelian.org> <581C8660.1070709@posteo.de> <581C90C7.5030809@abelian.org> <581C95BC.6010602@posteo.de> <581DA8E4.5010701@abelian.org> <581DB9C0.10602@posteo.de> <581DCF2E.5090902@abelian.org> <581F9797.9060709@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <581F9797.9060709@abelian.org> X-Scan-Signature: fa743f59d022704fe4104ed922c6083c Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050905060901020507050007" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Length: 5792 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9430 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050905060901020507050007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Paul, VLF, OK, the QRN is very low! Let us start a series of experiments. I would like to continue working on the idea to build an overylay of a few transmissions to rise the SNR and to lead to a decode by that way. Also i would like to use the 8K19A mode again just that i am able to decode the message on my own PCs (via the remote stream from the tree) so i can test if it works. You know the text files generated by SpecLab contain numbers like "8269.6142 -1.3112E-08 -7.4201E-08 -1.2608E-08 -5.5143E-08 2.7815E-08" and so on. If i could add them simply by adding the numbers/values i could build the same overlay, coherently? This is what i want to experiment with. Also for you, i chose a message with less characters, so you can get a decode and see the phase pattern. Then you can see how much SNR improvement you will get when adding the data of two transmissions with known SNR and you will see (if the start time and length is kept constant) how the phase varies each day. So: *f = 6470.00000 Hz Start time: 11.11.2016 08:00:00 UTC (Daily repetition) Symbol length: 60 s Characters: 4 CRC 16 Coding 8K19A Duration: 7h, 44m, 0s* *Antenna current: ~ 280 mA * I hope that will lead to some better understanding of the propagation on that 46km band and for getting an idea if that coherent adding of daily transmissions makes sense, and where the limit of the SNR improvement tends to. Suggestions welcome. 73, Stefan Am 06.11.2016 21:50, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > Stefan wrote: > > > f = 6470.00000 Hz > > Start time: 03.11.2016 06:00:00 UTC > > Symbol length: 30 s > > Characters: 11 > > CRC 16 > > Coding 16K25A > > and > > > A second transmission is running now [5th Nov] > > Same message, symbol length, phase orientation > > and start time... > > No decode of either message. > > I added the two days coherently and that also failed to > decode. I tested the processing with simulated signals > and that gave the expected 3dB gain. > > Looked at the cross correlation of the two days but can > see nothing. The simulated signals at about Eb/N0 0.0dB > are visible on a cross correlation. > > This will only work if the received phase doesn't change > much from one day to another. We may need some luck, some > stable weather and ionosphere. > > To keep the office warm, the computer is trying some > range of phase shifts between the two days. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > --------------050905060901020507050007 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Paul, VLF,

OK, the QRN is very low!
Let us start a series of experiments. I would like to continue working on the idea to build an overylay of a few transmissions to rise the SNR and to lead to a decode by that way. Also i would like to use the 8K19A mode again just that i am able to decode the message on my own PCs (via the remote stream from the tree) so i can test if it works. You know the text files generated by SpecLab contain numbers like "8269.6142 -1.3112E-08 -7.4201E-08 -1.2608E-08 -5.5143E-08 2.7815E-08" and so on. If i could add them simply by adding the numbers/values i could build the same overlay, coherently? This is what i want to experiment with.
Also for you, i chose a message with less characters, so you can get a decode and see the phase pattern. Then you can see how much SNR improvement you will get when adding the data of two transmissions with known SNR and you will see (if the start time and length is kept constant) how the phase varies each day.
So:

f = 6470.00000 Hz
Start time: 11.11.2016   08:00:00 UTC (Daily repetition)
Symbol length: 60 s
Characters: 4
CRC 16
Coding 8K19A
Duration: 7h, 44m, 0s

Antenna current: ~ 280 mA

I hope that will lead to some better understanding of the propagation on that 46km band and for getting an idea if that coherent adding of daily transmissions makes sense, and where the limit of the SNR improvement tends to.

Suggestions welcome.

73, Stefan


Am 06.11.2016 21:50, schrieb Paul Nicholson:

Stefan wrote:

> f = 6470.00000 Hz
> Start time: 03.11.2016   06:00:00 UTC
> Symbol length: 30 s
> Characters: 11
> CRC 16
> Coding 16K25A

and

> A second transmission is running now [5th Nov]
> Same message, symbol length, phase orientation
> and start time...

No decode of either message.

I added the two days coherently and that also failed to
decode.  I tested the processing with simulated signals
and that gave the expected 3dB gain.

Looked at the cross correlation of the two days but can
see nothing.  The simulated signals at about Eb/N0 0.0dB
are visible on a cross correlation.

This will only work if the received phase doesn't change
much from one day to another.  We may need some luck, some
stable weather and ionosphere.

To keep the office warm, the computer is trying some
range of phase shifts between the two days.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

--------------050905060901020507050007--