Return-Path: Received: from rly-me09.mx.aol.com (rly-me09.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.43]) by air-me03.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINME032-9d94afd745e28b; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:59:57 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me09.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME095-9d94afd745e28b; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:59:44 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N8xc5-0002uH-Jr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:59:01 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N8xc5-0002u8-4Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:59:01 +0000 Received: from mail-gx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.217.221]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N8xc3-0005uS-08 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:59:01 +0000 Received: by gxk21 with SMTP id 21so3348575gxk.10 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:58:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=V50aHxrTlQ3x8t5/ggQ6vyrW/qio/jDPJ1ECf+tKbzA=; b=tIio8JC1s2m4lXbnEl5/0t6XKHbYZL9cJkSxUSyiQAOzLLQnm4yrqHzNyRK8lBUL+a rMlV5UOCUgu0Jjd/xSHnJeF4TgFbK2aUaWPrXzM9i48VqOeIRZhMhiDW3inQSkiMdufp P5ppeZUzgiNzDjyUV6fXhYZdgkb6XPJzDvnY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Q6yxu6YTVcpcr5b0oOly5yDrhk74NY9+R4WsBoMVDKLrfaut25xOw7rWAYtQl7lwmS upBPyzwsIk9fE9q+wwQCcV3H/CDcnnLkfFXwuWcdlmIwkQOXXyLWDjaJxTq61BUzZGq+ NVm1NHT3Fdp8DUFJPpDzpeaVsZ4YAg0upQiWw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.38.4 with SMTP id l4mr7969789ybl.340.1258124332358; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:58:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AFD6D5F.3020302@telus.net> References: <2EB9AB3966984B91BB0C369B32CF12FC@AGB> <4AFCC936.9060800@telus.net> <4AFD125A.3060402@sighthound.demon.co.uk> <4AFD6D5F.3020302@telus.net> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:58:52 -0500 Message-ID: <57a24ca70911130658h5a32b7a5o731ad8126b569c37@mail.gmail.com> From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: Are the new VE stations able to qso with other amature stations ?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d277.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Scott, Graham, John P-G, > VX is in developmental service (same idea as US stations) I would like to clarify the situation with regard to US Experimental licenses and their ability to communicate with other classes of license. As a matter of course Experimental stations are permitted to communicate only with other Experimental stations but exceptions can be granted on a case by case basis. For the Experimental licenses for which I filed the application myself (eg. WD2XGJ, WE2XEB, and WE2XGR) I put a clause in the application requesting permission to communicate with foreign amateurs. When the licenses issued they all contain the statement: "the licensee hereof is hereby authorized to use and operate the radio transmitting facilities hereinafter described for radio communications in accordance with the program of experimentation described by the licensee in its application for license." Since part of my program of experimentation as described in the application for the license was "communication with foreign amateurs" I believe that I covered that base. Certain other US Experimental licenses do not have the ability to communicate with amateurs in their application (in one case that I know of the FCC questioned a similar request causing the applicant dropped the request). The bottom line is that it depends on the specific license, I can only speak directly for WD2XGJ, WE2XEB, and WE2XGR but I believe that some other US Experimental licenses also have the ability to QSO with amateurs. I know that the WD2XSH stations DO NOT have the ability to QSO with amateurs. -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Scott Tilley wrote: > Hi John > > VX is in developmental service (same idea as US stations), EI in amateur > service... Like positive and negative antimatter they don't mix. > > 73 Scott > > > John P-G wrote: >> >> Scott Tilley wrote: >>> >>> Hi Graham >>> >>> All Canadian 600m stations are operating under COMMERCIAL Developmental >>> Licenses and are not able to communicate with the Amateur Service. >> >> So VX9MRC shouldn't be having regular CW QSOs with EI0CF? >> >> Still confused.... >> >> John >> GM4SLV >> >> > >