Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,
	RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u7I9EuJP000380
	for <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:14:56 +0200
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1baJHg-0005zZ-Hd
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:06:44 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.34] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1baJHf-0005zQ-Ra
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:06:43 +0100
Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66])
	by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <selberdenken@posteo.de>)
	id 1baJHd-0004jw-BE
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:06:42 +0100
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
	by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AD55209AF
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:06:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3sFKvg4WYyz104x
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:06:07 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <57B57A7F.8030606@posteo.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:06:07 +0200
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <1568e4e7b0d-3ffe-84ff@webprd-a106.mail.aol.com> <57B1CE68.6070904@posteo.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1608152044510.13500@plato.ucs.mun.ca> <57B31538.1090509@posteo.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1608161551530.17017@plato.ucs.mun.ca> <57B4232B.4070702@posteo.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1608172006380.21963@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1608172006380.21963@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
X-Scan-Signature: ab7de7439a3fce0b74220375dc6f18e8
Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut on LF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 8594

Hi Joe,

Thanks for the feedback.
Yes, 137.477 is fine.
A text file has 1516 kB here. The one that could contain your message is 
at https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/08152347.txt Markus 
already asked for the file to try to decode what i received in JN49IK. 
My sr-file contains "30000.6436 128 524288 137500".

73, Stefan

Am 18.08.2016 00:42, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Perhaps I should QSY back to 137.477 again!  On 777 tonight and will
> try 477 tomorrow if that's OK.  How big are the text files?
>
> I use your grabber to check my sigs.  Thanks for this service!
>
> Joe
>
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, DK7FC wrote:
>
>> Hello Joe,
>>
>> I'm sorry, i forgot to mention that i'm getting my EbNaut decodes 
>> from the exportet FFT data (text files) from OPDS. That means the 
>> transmission must be somewhere arround 137.5 kHz +- 50 Hz.
>> Maybe i can search for a PC with 64 bit here in the institute to 
>> decode your 155 char message. I still have the text file :-)
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>
>> Am 16.08.2016 20:33, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca:
>>> OK Stefan, lets try a shorter message (54 chars) tonight starting 
>>> 2300 utc and every 15 mins.  150 watts 2 amps RF. 137.777 kHz  1432 
>>> 0.2 s
>>> symbols, 4K19A.
>>>
>>> I like my 32 bit machine too!
>>>
>>> Thanks for the helpful advice Markus.  I noticed the different colours
>>> on your grabber.  Will go for a shorter message this time.
>>>
>>> 73
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, DK7FC wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately it looks like the EbNaut decoder can't decode 155 
>>>> characters on this PC (4 GB RAM). The number of characters seems to 
>>>> be limited to 66 :-(
>>>> I don't have any 64 bit systems available here.
>>>>
>>>> 73, Stefan
>>>>
>>>> Am 16.08.2016 01:24, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca:
>>>>> Dear Group,
>>>>>
>>>>> Reports of the OP32 sigs from R7NT, F5WK, Graham, Markus, Hugh, 
>>>>> Stefan
>>>>> Dominico and others who I inadvertently left out are gratefully 
>>>>> acknowledged.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tonight by popular demand starting 2330 and every 15 mins, EbNaut 155
>>>>> chars 0.2 seconds 771.2 s message duration, 4K19A polynomial.  500w
>>>>> 3.5A to the 100m RL. Reports most welcomed. Good luck to all.
>>>>> (Let's hope I've set it up correctly!)
>>>>>
>>>>> Joe VO1NA
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, DK7FC wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Markus,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, very nice. 131 characters in 0.2 s symbols, that's great!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Joe, could you run a similar transmission again? Maybe with a 
>>>>>> longer text :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, Stefan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 15.08.2016 15:05, schrieb Markus Vester:
>>>>>>> Hi Stefan, here's a result from Joe's 131 character 
>>>>>>> transmission, Dec 4/5 2015.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best 73,
>>>>>>> Markus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
>>>>>>> Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
>>>>>>> An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>>>>>>> Verschickt: Mo, 15 Aug 2016 1:55 pm
>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: LF: last 23 Hr 136 op32
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is it right that you sent some EbNaut with many symbols on LF in 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> past (last season) ?
>>>>>>> I didn't give it a try that time. Now i would be interested in a TA
>>>>>>> detection of an EbNaut signal.
>>>>>>> Which symbol length did you choose that time?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73, Stefan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 15.08.2016 01:13, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca <mailto:jcraig@mun.ca>:
>>>>>>> > Thank-you Graham and Dominico.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I was suprised to get the reports because there was a mismatch.
>>>>>>> > The Decca was on one module only to see what happens.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Just started an OP32 frame 2300 utc with 500 watts 3.5 amps 
>>>>>>> and without
>>>>>>> > a mismatch.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Friday night's lightning may have modified the tuning coil --
>>>>>>> > it took a while to clean the soot and ashes! It has been rebuilt
>>>>>>> > and seems to be working well. It has taps for the RL and another
>>>>>>> > for the tower as a back-up when the RL is out of service.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 73 to all
>>>>>>> > Joe VO1NA
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>