Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1481; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u7PF3j1V022979 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:03:45 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bcw88-0003Hv-Mr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:59:44 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bcw88-0003Hm-9Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:59:44 +0100 Received: from vigilant.es ([87.106.80.234] helo=mail.vigilant.es) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bcw85-0007j5-Eu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:59:43 +0100 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([87.216.178.132]) by vigilant.es with MailEnable ESMTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:55:28 +0200 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448]) by servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:54:06 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?VIGILANT_Luis_Fern=E1ndez?= To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: sensors that predict when the Northern Lights will be visible in the UK. Thread-Index: AQHR/tTEGNyoKVoK0k+9AjmcHxc2vqBZw0XQ Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:54:05 +0000 Message-ID: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D7D12BA@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.0.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 08189ecf0514bcba2be8490569e8d13c Subject: LF: RE: sensors that predict when the Northern Lights will be visible in the UK. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D7D12BAservigilantvigi_" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8620 --_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D7D12BAservigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This really remainds me of this other. very similar A lawnmower has been blamed for wrongly triggering sensors that predict whe= n the Northern Lights will be visible in the UK. A red alert issued via the Aurora Watch mailing list was withdrawn after sensor r= eadings were found to be "spurious". An investigation revealed a lawnmower had got too close to one sensor, trig= gering a "massive spike" in data. Aurora Watch said it was looking into ways to avoid the incident being repe= ated. The bogus alert was issued during the afternoon of 23 August, after a magne= tometer at the University of Lancaster recorded a surge in geomagnetic acti= vity. Trim grass Aurora Watch is run by scientists at the university and takes readings from= lots of magnetometers to work out when the aurora borealis will be visible= across Britain. The project draws on magnetometers in Lancaster, Aberdeen, the Faroe Island= s and further field. The alert was withdrawn four hours after being released as it emerged only = one sensor had recorded the spike in activity. A later update posted to the Aurora Watch webpage said an investigation had= revealed that a groundskeeper using a "sit-on mower" to trim grass had bee= n driving too close to the sensor, prompting the spike. "We'll work with the facilities team to try and avoid an incident such as t= his occurring in the future," said the scientists. They explained any metal placed on the instrument or machinery operating ne= arby could trick it into recording more activity than was actually present. Readings from the Lancaster sensor were not typically used to trigger alert= s, they said, but problems with the main sensor in Aberdeen on 23 August me= ant it had become the lead monitor. ________________________________ De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blackshe= ep.org] En nombre de Graham Enviado el: jueves, 25 de agosto de 2016 15:20 Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Asunto: LF: sensors that predict when the Northern Lights will be visible i= n the UK. 73-G, )) A lawnmower has been blamed for wrongly triggering sensors that predict whe= n the Northern Lights will be visible in the UK. A red alert issued via the Aurora Watch mailing list was withdrawn after sensor r= eadings were found to be "spurious". An investigation revealed a lawnmower had got too close to one sensor, trig= gering a "massive spike" in data. Aurora Watch said it was looking into ways to avoid the incident being repe= ated. The bogus alert was issued during the afternoon of 23 August, after a magne= tometer at the University of Lancaster recorded a surge in geomagnetic acti= vity. Trim grass Aurora Watch is run by scientists at the university and takes readings from= lots of magnetometers to work out when the aurora borealis will be visible= across Britain. The project draws on magnetometers in Lancaster, Aberdeen, the Faroe Island= s and further field. The alert was withdrawn four hours after being released as it emerged only = one sensor had recorded the spike in activity. A later update posted to the Aurora Watch webpage said an investigation had= revealed that a groundskeeper using a "sit-on mower" to trim grass had bee= n driving too close to the sensor, prompting the spike. "We'll work with the facilities team to try and avoid an incident such as t= his occurring in the future," said the scientists. They explained any metal placed on the instrument or machinery operating ne= arby could trick it into recording more activity than was actually present. Readings from the Lancaster sensor were not typically used to trigger alert= s, they said, but problems with the main sensor in Aberdeen on 23 August me= ant it had become the lead monitor. --_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D7D12BAservigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This really remainds me of this o= ther. very similar
&= nbsp;
 

A lawnmower has been blamed for wrongly triggering sensors that predict whe= n the Northern Lights will be visible in the UK.

A red alert issued via the Aurora Watch mailing list was withdrawn=  after sensor readings were found to be "spurious".

An investigation revealed a lawnmower had got too close to one sensor, trig= gering a "massive spike" in data.

Aurora Watch said it was looking into ways to avoid the incident being repe= ated.

The bogus alert was issued during the afternoon of 23 August, after a magne= tometer at the University of Lancaster recorded a surge in geomagnetic acti= vity.

Trim grass

Aurora Watch is run by scientists at the university and takes readings from= lots of magnetometers to work out when the aurora borealis will be visible= across Britain.

The project draws on magnetometers in Lancaster, Aberdeen, the Faroe Island= s and further field.

The alert was withdrawn four hours after being released as it emerged only = one sensor had recorded the spike in activity.

A later update posted to the Aurora Watch webpage said an investigation had= revealed that a groundskeeper using a "sit-on mower" to trim gra= ss had been driving too close to the sensor, prompting the spike.

"We'll work with the facilities team to try and avoid an incident such= as this occurring in the future," said the scientists.

They explained any metal placed on the instrument or machinery operating ne= arby could trick it into recording more activity than was actually present.=

Readings from the Lancaster sensor were not typically used to trigger alert= s, they said, but problems with the main sensor in Aberdeen on 23 August me= ant it had become the lead monitor.



De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.= org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] En nombre de Graham
Enviado el: jueves, 25 de agosto de 2016 15:20
Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Asunto: LF: sensors that predict when the Northern Lights will be vi= sible in the UK.

73-G, ))

A lawnmower has been blamed for wrongly triggering sensors that predict whe= n the Northern Lights will be visible in the UK.

A red alert issued via the Aurora Watch mailing list was withdrawn=  after sensor readings were found to be "spurious".

An investigation revealed a lawnmower had got too close to one sensor, trig= gering a "massive spike" in data.

Aurora Watch said it was looking into ways to avoid the incident being repe= ated.

The bogus alert was issued during the afternoon of 23 August, after a magne= tometer at the University of Lancaster recorded a surge in geomagnetic acti= vity.

Trim grass

Aurora Watch is run by scientists at the university and takes readings from= lots of magnetometers to work out when the aurora borealis will be visible= across Britain.

The project draws on magnetometers in Lancaster, Aberdeen, the Faroe Island= s and further field.

The alert was withdrawn four hours after being released as it emerged only = one sensor had recorded the spike in activity.

A later update posted to the Aurora Watch webpage said an investigation had= revealed that a groundskeeper using a "sit-on mower" to trim gra= ss had been driving too close to the sensor, prompting the spike.

"We'll work with the facilities team to try and avoid an incident such= as this occurring in the future," said the scientists.

They explained any metal placed on the instrument or machinery operating ne= arby could trick it into recording more activity than was actually present.=

Readings from the Lancaster sensor were not typically used to trigger alert= s, they said, but problems with the main sensor in Aberdeen on 23 August me= ant it had become the lead monitor.

--_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D7D12BAservigilantvigi_--