Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1102; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_MESSAGE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t4Q8vqHR015104 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 10:57:52 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1YxAcx-0002Ut-ST for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 09:54:23 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1YxAcx-0002Uk-AH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 09:54:23 +0100 Received: from s16315160.onlinehome-server.info ([87.106.80.234] helo=mail.vigilant.es) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YxAcv-0008VP-K8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 09:54:22 +0100 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([87.216.178.132]) by vigilant.es with MailEnable ESMTP; Tue, 26 May 2015 10:53:50 +0200 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::3cdf:95f8:c1c9:3931]) by servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::3cdf:95f8:c1c9:3931%17]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 26 May 2015 10:54:04 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?VIGILANT_Luis_Fern=E1ndez?= To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: 630M WSPR T/A - WSPR-15? Thread-Index: AQHQl0oprKD+xLI2V0WhBDlP+z9ttZ2NZ2IIgACMF6A= Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 08:54:04 +0000 Message-ID: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B10AB83@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: <742C1F58E9DB405D9BC9B7E28E1AD112@White> Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.0.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: RE: LF: 630M WSPR T/A - WSPR-15? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B10AB83servigilantvigi_" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3281 --_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B10AB83servigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Markus said >>I wonder if it is possible to run two instances of WSPRX side by side on = the same machine, one for -2 and one for -15? Or would they crash one anoth= er? I'm actually running WSPR-2 on MF, WSPR-2 on LF and WSPR-15 on LF. If exper= iments are going to continue can set another WSPR-15 on MF All of them are WSPR-X and had to create different directories for the diff= erent WSPR instances. That works on Win7 .... for me at least ! :-) 73 de Luis EA5DOM --_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B10AB83servigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Markus said

>>I wonder if it is possible to run two instances of WSPRX side by sid= e on the same machine, one for -2 and one for -15? Or would they crash one another?

I'm actually running WSPR-2 on MF, WSPR-2 on LF and WSPR-15 = on LF. If experiments are going to continue can set another WSPR-15 on MF

All of them are WSPR-X and had to create different dire= ctories for the different WSPR instances. That works on Win7 .... for me at= least ! :-)

73 de Luis

EA5DOM

--_000_579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B10AB83servigilantvigi_--