Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 70EB338000084; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:22:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SgHHu-0006eF-32 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:21:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SgHHt-0006e6-JI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:21:13 +0100 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SgHHr-0007Ll-S6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:21:12 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.14.151]) by mwinf5d48 with ME id PTMA1j0083FYniy03TMA8w; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:21:11 +0200 Message-ID: <578BF457DD834F6485E0093B26499230@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <4FDCE611.7070004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FDCEB38.9090807@kpnmail.nl> <4FDDE5F5.4000307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FDDE5F5.4000307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:21:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120617-0, 17/06/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes Chris is 50% of the distance I am to the delft sdr, over land that indices a big loss , I can decode using ros-mf-2 during the day time , with 150 watts to the Ae , during the night , I have decoded with round 500 mW Ae feed , Mal being on the sunny east coast , has a nice water path over to EU , just as gb4fpr , a path out to the west over the Atlantic and south down the river Mersey [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: c0336009bd9bab526ca27d297ea7579a Subject: Re: LF: MF propagation... Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1454fddf6226cc6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Yes Chris is 50% of the distance I am to the delft sdr, over land that indices a big loss , I can decode using ros-mf-2 during the day time , with 150 watts to the Ae , during the night , I have decoded with round 500 mW Ae feed , Mal being on the sunny east coast , has a nice water path over to EU , just as gb4fpr , a path out to the west over the Atlantic and south down the river Mersey But as we have proved with the 600 ft delta loop , a vertical section is a requirement to radiate effectively, most old marine installations , only had 30 or 40 feet of vertical wire from the radio room to the top wire , not sure how the salt water on the canvas , wire rigging and wooden hull's affected the signal , Mal might be able to advise on that ? G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Stefan Schäfer" Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 3:13 PM To: Subject: LF: MF propagation... > Jan, MF, > > Am 16.06.2012 22:23, schrieb pa3abk: >> >> >> FYI I have H24 solid CW QSO with g3xiz mostly S-7/8 about same distance >> both using about 100W. > > I can hear G3XIZ very well on the Delft web sdr. It looks to me like the > ground wave reaches much much wider above sea water. The effect seems to > be extreme on MF, even more than on LF or VLF. Is this possible, i mean > can you confirm it? > Oh, that would explain why all the vessels used 500 kHz for such a long > time :-) > > That would explain why you can hear G3XIZ H24, since you are much closer > to the sea than me. > > Here on the land the situation looks to be quite different during the > daytime... > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > >