Message-ID: <5777C5BF.1070702@posteo.de>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 15:46:39 +0200
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <5772DAC0.7080001@df3lp.de> <CAA8k23TGuNuOZcnJA42=EDxZgHMAVNeq9SM7=UhvTz6Noqa_FA@mail.gmail.com> <5773CA12.50009@posteo.de> <5773D53A.5070900@abelian.org>
In-Reply-To: <5773D53A.5070900@abelian.org>
Subject: Re: ULF: Key down signal on the 101 km band, still on the air
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Paul,

Can you already see something, even if not significant so far? The 
signal is on the air since 6 days now :-)

And, the only signal on that frequency which is stable in such a small 
bandwidth can be mine OR faint traces of your 1pps pulses from your 
right channel. I don't assume there are such traces but maybe you can 
proof it by generating a spectrum out of a 2 week integration (826 nHz 
BW) from your recordings, from a time before i started my transmission. 
Or, watch the spectrum at 2971 Hz or 2969 Hz.

73, Stefan


Am 29.06.2016 16:03, schrieb Paul Nicholson:
>
> > Paul, if you are reading this: It may be worth
> > to try to integrate the overall transmission
> > time into one peak.
>
> I've been trying with this transmission, and your earlier
> tests too.   Bandwidths down to 6.6 uHz.   I've been trying
> combinations of days and nights and both.
>
> So far, not the faintest hint of signal.
>
> I will continue to try, for as long as you can maintain the
> carrier without phase interruption.
>
> -- 
> Paul Nicholson
> -- 
>