Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u539cTLi024629 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:38:29 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1b8lTl-0007St-A0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 10:33:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1b8lTh-0007Sk-Ps for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 10:33:17 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1b8lTg-0003Bz-6P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 10:33:16 +0100 Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (dovecot03.posteo.de [172.16.0.13]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B44820A03 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dovecot03.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3rLf600rg2z5vNB for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <57514ED7.5080904@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:33:11 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <154c32c4dba-373a-24653@webprd-m58.mail.aol.com> <573CAF79.9040701@abelian.org> <573CBBF0.4030701@posteo.de> <573E5907.6020107@posteo.de> <573EA094.3040205@abelian.org> <573EF90F.1080201@posteo.de> <573FC4DA.3080107@abelian.org> <5740842D.3030000@posteo.de> <5744FA27.6010703@posteo.de> <574AF1CA.7080702@posteo.de> <57512B49.2080305@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <57512B49.2080305@abelian.org> X-Scan-Signature: 33d261536bb1467bb13d5764461d5ec4 Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8213 Hi Paul, OK, thanks for the feedback. I tell you the messages so you can extract more informations why they failed Message 22.05.2016: 'cqcq dk7fc in jn49ik' Message 25.05.2016: 'not very easy' 10 characters at 100 s symbols is the best result so far. Do you like to proceed with further attempts? Or is it to much effort for you? I have no problem with defeats. 73, Stefan Am 03.06.2016 09:01, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > Stefan wrote: > > > What about your results? Nothing? > > Nothing. > > > f = 6470.00000 Hz > > Start time: 22.05.2016 04:00:02 UTC > > Symbol length: 200 s > > Characters: 20 > > > f = 6470.00000 Hz > > Start time: 25.05.2016 04:00:02 UTC > > Symbol length: 140 s > > Characters: 13 > > I have to admit defeat on both these transmissions. > > I've tried a range of beam headings and so on but I guess it's > a few dB short of a decode. Some very noisy nights during > these tests. I've been experimenting with the sferic > blanker to try to improve performance on very strong sferics. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >