Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u3SH8JPg001615 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:08:19 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1avpJY-0004xK-2g for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:01:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1avpJX-0004xB-H6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:01:19 +0100 Received: from smtp-out01.xworks.net ([31.25.48.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1avpJV-00008z-TX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:01:18 +0100 Received: from mailbackend2 (cluster06.xworks.net [10.100.1.80]) by smtp-out01.xworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A021611FD for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:01:16 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=kabelmail.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1461862876; bh=7CIHExFyrRj85t5CwGY+PQ6wKl8fYabQS8PTLuyPD94=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: Content-Type; b=gxYloHdAmp3o8olLOvWG+L+E4FiOAWjbuWK0rQK01AVyvtrNMXKm2c6ZQRpRS2dug FeN79TYSb/t4jf7ybmbQJ+0JJGSWfGI6oslRablm/cy77e6YAiJR4JkXt393yZ0JtP JrPsZCR4UGV5J3lP9TLhd50E8dy2QvIOe3IWrEFM= Received: from [192.168.178.33] (ipbcc1500e.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [188.193.80.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpa.mediabeam.com with ESMTP id u3SH0q8V024429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:01:15 +0200 X-mediaBEAM-Originating-IP: [188.193.80.14] X-mediaBEAM-AUTHID: [DK1IS@kabelmail.de] To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <571CF2AD.9030207@posteo.de> <571D2966.5080104@posteo.de> <571D3034.8020204@mbsks.franken.de> <571D31EE.9030106@posteo.de> <571DD4DE.3080703@abelian.org> <571E54B9.9010208@posteo.de> <571E5C16.2090102@mbsks.franken.de> <571E5F26.1080605@mbsks.franken.de> <571E92A0.3000608@posteo.de> <571E98A7.5070503@posteo.de> <571F87A2.7000700@abelian.org> <571FC3E8.1000706@posteo.de> <5720D81D.6020609@abelian.org> <5720E958.2010104@posteo.de> <572102E9.7020607@posteo.de> <5721D33A.8040106@kabelmail.de> <7F6C1D2C25614FF8A0977D7469E9B6AA@Clemens0811> From: DK1IS Message-ID: <572243AA.5000808@kabelmail.de> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:08:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7F6C1D2C25614FF8A0977D7469E9B6AA@Clemens0811> X-mediaBEAM-AuthCheck: route13 X-mediaBEAM-AuthScore: 1.6/5.0, scanned in 0.921sec X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by smtpa.mediabeam.com id u3SH0q8V024429 X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: Re: VLF: T106-52 cores on VLF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id u3SH8JPg001615 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7894 Hi Clemens, > I have measured a big air core coil of approx. 3.37mH > - once w/o ferrites inside > - once with two identical ferrite cores (ĩi about 125) spaced by 2cm > - once with one core of the same type and dimensions exept > its height which is exactly twice of the cores above. > > See screenshot and picture. > The red trace is w/o ferrite core(s), > the green trace is with the two ferrite cores spaced apart > the blue trace on top is with the double height core. Interesting results indeed! > This is not exactly representing Stefan's coil because the ferrite cores are > much smaller in diameter than the coil but one can see a trend: > Eliminating the air gap between the cores has very little effect. Iīm not so sure about this because the axial demagnetisation factor of one or two toroid cores with high diameter-to-hight ratio is rather large compared with a longer "tube" of cores. The magnetic flux lines tend to use a short and direct way from face to face around the single core(s) thus diminishing the influence of the core material on the inductivity of the surrounding coil even more if they are much smaller in diameter than the coil. You can see this by comparing Stefans measurement with your own: inserting the cores at Stefans layout increases the inductivity with a factor of 3.8 whereas at your arragement the influence of the core is only marginal. Therefore at Stefans layout the effect of reducing the airgaps should be larger but thatīs just pure theory. Perhaps Stefan is willing to carry out a test - itīs not very risky! 73, Tom, DK1IS www.qrz.com/db/dk1is