Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 104; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u3GFTlAD027514 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 17:29:47 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1arS36-0002m5-Ai for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:22:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1arS35-0002lw-O3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:22:15 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1arS33-0002oB-73 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:22:14 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f198so14190099wme.0 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:22:12 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to; bh=PXsBam9V5sKXIJDa3LNftCwn8aTxhEYCbyWbGLsU+Z8=; b=CKSkXhUYTKyDh3n5pJOb4eDiJFknbpDeJVvK5GtMNdy+8L0wxnKqRJ2Zg2aa7j1fGi FXlji79ur2q4CA1K1DTK3eqcys6xWOyenHKvk5tHFXybG05FxfTK8cFGyxvrSdV2DoQ5 h8WBGX5G56hC2P3sK7vJOMAFQtyy4boFxEQeQvDA3DtwTgnBSVA9YNiu4qCULOkU1hD/ aGM+z/YRTV1kYq+2dg5fBuY3Pj8ldx2SG7HapXDkjiTEVqh3Ott+TXNJSrZbM0uvoDgF oBfuxfxqrUoq2qV1JBCttjJf7pdzqG9j1w58U5+idT/CLosscEdDozscQGSNO+f2cNnp Cs0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to; bh=PXsBam9V5sKXIJDa3LNftCwn8aTxhEYCbyWbGLsU+Z8=; b=F0cB/KptTxcBGplvibG1FTWdzEXBJZXpiIG4nN2EDwG9biAL0QhrwI+MLPO8M4jVXn 4aOn6waWJCuP7wWnP8wEN9LVdqGt0e7+ir/wZ1qPsd9VPpaQI53Ib6ENaD45byw1STJP gHA4xYOSdZUyxLLFjHL7fA19IqtpqXiFjf9RQuaEA4+fZx7mnpLEsuIni4fipk70JhHF 1gQZPkiA5l3QkzXCkPU32fG92fdvnj32poXU3G65sJBb73l20gRWw9m2foVJsYiFqVYe uJyzOtQgq1G9vDEMaRg0ZI4ZdxBsxZWROd47r1f3WFTJP4BJ56+y30Vr+Xg5kJkSqeQ+ Ulgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX1PxkLyMN/1cEASu5X1NJbgXbpH47IlUAtl75lqVJq3sF5qA87Z2E4Ne8AyQ3I0w== X-Received: by 10.194.3.105 with SMTP id b9mr29635570wjb.140.1460820131506; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (net-37-182-103-27.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [37.182.103.27]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t4sm17142415wmf.8.2016.04.16.08.22.10 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <571258A2.1080207@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 17:22:10 +0200 From: IZ7SLZ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <57120873.7030302@gmail.com> <8D365E97EC576BC-80C-944568@webmail-vm123.sysops.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <8D365E97EC576BC-80C-944568@webmail-vm123.sysops.aol.com> X-Scan-Signature: 18c242620d7d7b91a1caf5740aa3e326 Subject: Re: LF: sending EbNaut with SL on 137485.00 Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090106060706020003010504" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7741 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090106060706020003010504 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thanks Markus for advices, i'm workaround on the settings without success till now. Some Ebnaut's (13 char, 0.5s) again every 30' from 15:00U to 17:30U. This time with my traditional method i.e. ring modulator driven by EbNaut-TX with the RDF phase locked loop. 73, Domenico On 4/16/2016 1:23 PM, Markus Vester wrote: > Hi Domenico, > on the opds spectrogram there are currently two discrete peaks on > 137484 and 137486 Hz, plus some weaker ones spaced at 1 Hz intervals. > Thus it seems that you are modulating with a regular "101010..." > sequence rather than an EbNaut message? > Best 73, > Markus > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: IZ7SLZ > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Sa, 16 Apr 2016 11:41 am > Betreff: LF: sending EbNaut with SL on 137485.00 Hz > > Hello LF, > > i want to test this Wolf's Spectrum Lab feature > > http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/speclab/EbNaut_Rcvr.htm#sending_ebnaut_with_SL > > and i'm currently sending an EbNaut message on LF (13 characters, > 0.5s/bit, 8K19A) each XX:00, XX:30. Last transmission at 12:00 UT > > I'm using a non-linear PA so i want to check if SL MSK modulator can > help. > > I want also check if, using SL scheduler, there are no delay in the > activation time of the EbNaut sequence. > > Thanks for the attention. > > 73 and good we. > > Domenico, iz7slz > > > --------------090106060706020003010504 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Thanks Markus for advices,

i'm workaround on the settings without success till now.

Some Ebnaut's  (13 char, 0.5s) again every 30' from 15:00U to 17:30U. This time with my traditional method i.e. ring modulator driven by EbNaut-TX with the  RDF phase locked loop. 

73, Domenico




On 4/16/2016 1:23 PM, Markus Vester wrote:
Hi Domenico,
 
on the opds spectrogram there are currently two discrete peaks on 137484 and 137486 Hz, plus some weaker ones spaced at 1 Hz intervals. Thus it seems that you are modulating with a regular "101010..." sequence rather than an EbNaut message?
 
Best 73,
Markus
 
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: IZ7SLZ <iz7slz.domenico@gmail.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Sa, 16 Apr 2016 11:41 am
Betreff: LF: sending EbNaut with SL on 137485.00 Hz

Hello LF,

i want to test this Wolf's Spectrum Lab feature

http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/speclab/EbNaut_Rcvr.htm#sending_ebnaut_with_SL

and i'm currently sending an EbNaut message on LF (13 characters,
0.5s/bit, 8K19A) each XX:00, XX:30. Last transmission at 12:00 UT

I'm using a non-linear PA so i want to check if SL MSK modulator can help.

I want also check if, using SL scheduler, there are no delay in the
activation time of the EbNaut sequence.

Thanks for the attention.

73 and good we.

Domenico, iz7slz 
 
 
 


--------------090106060706020003010504--