Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w28HhOnR009966 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:43:25 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1etzTi-0008Pj-PP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:37:18 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1etzTe-0008Pa-UN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:37:14 +0000 Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1etzTb-0005qh-9w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:37:13 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id l43so6508009wrc.2 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 09:37:10 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X9SAx+h6zcKeuDmTwqa75FN3Ug1aVr7Y3aZajEuNIpc=; b=l9WkMLEYIyHyYZv4MY7C4o91fs+oGt1EilmIGh1CDSNilwtXAj4Jk/PkEd0wlm6uSP eFAj7aWbT+gRV2LpbaKFlYTJDV4JKMWYSiQ5VIqzPd1O+rSnFhuv8/nc2Jgi0uRr1HY3 66Kg9kxbSmTttJbgYfkkH3HcNs94Zr/NHJbsEYeWp7YmD7y7WHRrw/8A7VAB87yudx55 m3KHeOePFoPK/Z57E8AEZv/5lcLMxA9n5o4SQjY9uJY7WhKfHrjsIiBLF6brX0ZgwJ4S ++KV13Bx76TvLclFTW9bIpSt/yF04+/hJslRxYBdx3RqmgMxbhlR2adBgooNZHEsa7H0 0mLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X9SAx+h6zcKeuDmTwqa75FN3Ug1aVr7Y3aZajEuNIpc=; b=Qn0p7L3IgnDBnI5BKV2YYQZdcpxBvubGWRcdv7YbMOI7hetjBSkbpYHOpT4YvDBas/ L6fx9xbgZucMCtunz+tHjd36UUEQruQ0Wdr4ZBwUdMIfmzOihSsIaN6toquuNq3iblQf oeOq96OPcsDiEAMY8BRA8nT8qp5aplrQUQZyfDa0+kcO/1FIKLA0sps5JPXvSoVWSbHG 4CwbvjCS5XUG8AppyRwCqZMJgNck89YRnXsF/9Ij9GHOb8WnlpQNqJHnKLYEgQXOcplT hfVQscE/TsYsqzOoHtzb/HrwV3miJXV/Lj7Bgf5ZDjY54U9jTOCBjjPMU6lG4kfC00QY 0HUA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAQuTyu+Ls2tZ21hMpADGzx0HwjbGG3AgrkGdkW/he8EnMklr0i W6Tm5xOb96xfTHqgGDshD2a8/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELulcDoHx3ZXXf1kaXJYPHEdLQHmG7y5wZjAmrn/06UcmPAm+uTAyeC9r6EFTzbUgv3ftKrLOg== X-Received: by 10.223.175.235 with SMTP id y43mr22507494wrd.41.1520530628472; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 09:37:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10sm17535057wrf.37.2018.03.08.09.37.06 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Mar 2018 09:37:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:37:05 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <5710661673.20180308173705@gmail.com> To: N1BUG CC: dead.fets@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello N1BUG, Paul, I would have thought what wire was NOT wound on the toroid would also get hot if the current carrying capacity of the wire was inadequate. Is that the case? Have you got a thermocouple to put on the external wire? Just my guess, I have my asbestos pants ready.... :) [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: blog.n1bug.com] 0.1 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: blog.n1bug.com] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f Subject: Re: LF: A different inductor heating question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello N1BUG, Paul, I would have thought what wire was NOT wound on the toroid would also get hot if the current carrying capacity of the wire was inadequate. Is that the case? Have you got a thermocouple to put on the external wire? Just my guess, I have my asbestos pants ready.... :) Thursday, March 8, 2018, 3:00:53 PM, you wrote: > I have a question about iron powder toroidal inductor heating... > I built an experimental PA for 137 kHz. Details can be seen here: > http://blog.n1bug.com/ > For the three inductors I've used T157-2 cores with 20 AWG wire. > This PA works well enough. With a 34N20 FET I have been running 150W > output mixed WSPR-15 and WSPR-2 for more than one week already. Last > night I increased power to 175W and all was still OK. The output > looks as clean as expected on a spectrum analyzer. > Two of the three inductors heat up (L1 and L2). I have the wire > wound over about 80% of the core so there is 20% core with no > winding. If I transmit for 2 minutes, I can feel no heat touching > the open 20% of the core. If I touch the wire it is quite warm, with > L2 being more warm than L1. My first assumption was that the wire > must be heating because the empty part of the core does not feel > warm. I do not know what the peak or average current in these > inductors is, but I am having some trouble believing it can be high > enough to cause the wire to heat to this extent. > What do you think? Is my theory that this must be wire heating > valid? I do not know the thermal properties of the core material but > I thought if this is core heating the entire core should get warm. > Is this a wrong assumption? > I do not plan to rebuild the PA as it works OK already and it is > temporary. But I would like to better understand this. > 73, > Paul N1BUG -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com