Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1181; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u3D9mjDW015378 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:48:45 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aqHLO-0000rt-Gj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:44:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aqHLN-0000rk-Vh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:44:17 +0100 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1aqHLM-0005X0-E6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:44:16 +0100 Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (dovecot03.posteo.de [172.16.0.13]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6F9220AF8 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:44:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dovecot03.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3qlJmG3Btdz5vMw for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:44:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <570E14EE.5030101@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:44:14 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <570CD871.7020909@posteo.de>,<579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB53B671DD@servigilant.vigilant.local> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB53B67DF9@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB53B67DF9@servigilant.vigilant.local> X-Scan-Signature: 1c38f63d01970a2bf149f660c9cb2a37 Subject: Re: LF: Also EA in VLF soon? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060102070409010603030003" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7687 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060102070409010603030003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Luis, VLF, Luis, what about VLF in EA? Would you like to try to receive something from there? With a small active antenna on the top of the building you could do some first _RX tests_ to prepare for our first VLF QSO then :-) What do you think? LF is about 10x 'harder' then MF (for the ERP). But with the same ERP you can make much more distance on LF. VLF (8270) is about 300x 'harder' then LF! So you can get a first impression... But you would need much less ERP to make the same distance on VLF! :-) 73, Stefan --------------060102070409010603030003 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Luis, VLF,

Luis, what about VLF in EA? Would you like to try to receive something from there? With a small active antenna on the top of the building you could do some first RX tests to prepare for our first VLF QSO then :-)
What do you think?

LF is about 10x 'harder' then MF (for the ERP). But with the same ERP you can make much more distance on LF.

VLF (8270) is about 300x 'harder' then LF! So you can get a first impression... But you would need much less ERP to make the same distance on VLF! :-)

73, Stefan
--------------060102070409010603030003--