Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 104; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u1OKEiX6015990 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:14:44 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aYflJ-0003D4-DU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:10:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aYfkb-0003Cq-Sm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:09:33 +0000 Received: from brian.netcom.co.uk ([217.72.171.64]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aYfia-0007Fs-Ls for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:09:29 +0000 Received: from sb.abelian.org (i-194-106-52-83.freedom2surf.net [194.106.52.83]) by brian.netcom.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D6A320088 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:44:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sb.abelian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EC928A021A for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <56CE0D5D.4000402@abelian.org> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:06:53 +0000 From: Paul Nicholson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <56CDE2EB.3080906@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <56CDE2EB.3080906@posteo.de> X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonight Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6972 Very nice, a good result at about 70% of capacity for that carrier S/N. The 54% bit error rate is false, indicating part of the signal was missing, I guess there was some padding. This misleads the error calculation so that it comes up with crazy Eb/N0 like -7.9 dB. The 0.1dB calculated from the carrier strength is almost correct. -- Paul Nicholson --