Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1002; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u0NCdeeU008132 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:39:40 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aMxPi-00021S-4I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:35:34 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aMxPh-00021J-A9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:35:33 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aMxOd-0007tP-7Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:35:32 +0000 Received: from dovecot03.posteo.de (dovecot03.posteo.de [172.16.0.13]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1002089A for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:34:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dovecot03.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3pncMj0XYbz5vNF for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:34:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <56A37340.90307@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:34:08 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <569E4748.18680.1008D94@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <569F8A29.90200@charter.net> <9129A20A2E49400A83D066DE9E2B601A@gnat> <56A0CF17.5070506@posteo.de> <56A22B69.6030102@posteo.de> <3A4B07A1CF0E4B5C883A127FCC5486A4@gnat>,<4F9581849DDC451A8481ED82778DDDBE@MikePC> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB2532C499@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB2532C499@servigilant.vigilant.local> X-Scan-Signature: 18c242620d7d7b91a1caf5740aa3e326 Subject: Re: LF: Re: DST and propagation Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050705000206020602050809" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6465 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050705000206020602050809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Luis, Am 23.01.2016 10:48, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: > Hi MF > > TA conditions favouring low latitudes again ? Yes, obviously :-) This also fits to our understanding. Same on LF: The path to UA0SNV can be open while it is completely closed to JA, which can be observed on the DCF39 plot on the Tokyo LF grabber... 73, Stefan > I was the only one spotted last night > > Sorry, can not copy the spots here. Saw them once but now WSPR server > looks out of order again :( > > 73 de Luis > EA5DOM > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *De:* owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] en nombre de Michael Sapp > [wa3tts@verizon.net] > *Enviado:* viernes, 22 de enero de 2016 16:26 > *Para:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Asunto:* Re: LF: Re: DST and propagation > > Alan, Stefan & All: The LF T/A dx event did coincide with or just > after a C-class X-ray flux event of moderate duration (30 minutes or > so). It was a lower level C-class event in the C2 or C3 range. > Perhaps the combination of the X-ray flux event and geomagnetic state > are involved in the propagation enhancement. > Also interesting that the resulting T/A dx event was farther to the > south in the U.S. Perhaps some seasonal cyclic factor is involved as > well. I was surprised that neither WG2XJM, WG2XKA, W1VD, or W1TAG > reported any T/A in that time period, although VD and TAG may not have > been on the air at the time. To the west I have not had any captures > from WH2XCR in the last week or so, although other stations farther > south of my location have captured XCR recently and XJM has done so > with his large RX antenna arrays. If there is a seasonal-latitude > probability factor in addition to the X-ray flux and geomagnetic > states, then I would expect better chances of T/A events in the coming > months of Febuary and March of this year for my inland location. > 73, Mike wa3tts > --------------050705000206020602050809 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Luis,

Am 23.01.2016 10:48, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:
Hi MF

TA conditions favouring low latitudes again ?
Yes, obviously :-)
This also fits to our understanding. Same on LF: The path to UA0SNV can be open while it is completely closed to JA, which can be observed on the DCF39 plot on the Tokyo LF grabber...

73, Stefan


I was the only one spotted last night

Sorry, can not copy the spots here. Saw them once but now WSPR server looks out of order again :(

73 de Luis
EA5DOM
De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] en nombre de Michael Sapp [wa3tts@verizon.net]
Enviado: viernes, 22 de enero de 2016 16:26
Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Asunto: Re: LF: Re: DST and propagation

Alan, Stefan & All: The LF T/A dx event did coincide with or just after a C-class X-ray flux event of moderate duration (30 minutes or so).  It was a lower level C-class event in the C2 or C3 range.  Perhaps the combination of the X-ray flux event and geomagnetic state are involved in the propagation enhancement. 
 
Also interesting that the resulting T/A dx event was farther to the south in the U.S. Perhaps some seasonal cyclic factor is involved as well.   I was surprised that neither WG2XJM, WG2XKA, W1VD, or W1TAG reported any T/A in that time period, although VD and TAG may not have been on the air at the time.  To the west I have not had any captures from WH2XCR in the last week or so, although other stations farther south of my location have captured XCR recently and XJM has done so with his large RX antenna arrays.  If there is a seasonal-latitude probability factor in addition to the X-ray flux and geomagnetic states, then I would expect better chances of T/A events in the coming months  of Febuary and March of this year for my inland location.
 
73, Mike wa3tts

--------------050705000206020602050809--