Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id tB3L1PqG008567 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 22:01:25 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1a4axf-0007IA-8g for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 20:58:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1a4axf-0007I1-0H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 20:58:43 +0000 Received: from smtp3.virginbroadband.com.au ([123.200.191.53] helo=smtp.virginbroadband.com.au) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1a4awb-0005ML-R4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 20:58:41 +0000 Received: from [1.178.143.139] (unknown [1.178.143.139]) by smtp.virginbroadband.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBA211681A6 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 07:57:11 +1100 (EST) References: <8D2FA5F73070DF3-164C-1B0DC6@webmail-vm091.sysops.aol.com> <8D2FB0E41DBD77B-1DC0-A28C5@webmail-vd012.sysops.aol.com> <565F09BB.6090709@abelian.org> <565F692A.4080401@abelian.org> <566004DB.7000309@virginbroadband.com.au> From: edgar To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <5660AC9E.4090109@virginbroadband.com.au> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 07:57:02 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <566004DB.7000309@virginbroadband.com.au> X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 123.200.191.53 (smtp3.virginbroadband.com.au) used invalid HELO/EHLO smtp.virginbroadband.com.au - verification failed X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut 137.777 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030601070602030602040205" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5531 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030601070602030602040205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Paul and Andy, My question on the use of GPSDO for EbNaut was to improve my limited understanding of the equipment required. It was not intended to directly compare Rubidium Oscillators vrs GPSDO. I had considered that a GPSDO had the advantage of providing a PPS. Also the frequency, and possibly the phase of the reference signal, would be known and be similar at both locations. Thank you for your feed back. Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania. --------------030601070602030602040205 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Paul and Andy,

My question on the use of GPSDO for EbNaut was to improve my limited understanding of the equipment required.

It was not intended to directly compare Rubidium Oscillators vrs GPSDO.

I had considered that a GPSDO had the advantage of providing a PPS.

Also the frequency, and possibly the phase of the reference signal, would be known and be similar at both locations.

Thank you for your feed back.

Regards, Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.
 --------------030601070602030602040205--