Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.67.23.138 with SMTP id ia10csp180435pad; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:29:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.187.169 with SMTP id ft9mr4423666wic.14.1379456953591; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id df6si14966598wjc.144.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VM38d-0002nV-Al for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:48:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VM38c-0002nM-OH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:48:50 +0100 Received: from omr-d01.mx.aol.com ([205.188.252.208]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VM38Z-0003ZH-UN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:48:49 +0100 Received: from mtaout-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.198]) by omr-d01.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 59956700544C0 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:48:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from White (95-91-237-80-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.237.80]) by mtaout-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 6B2FAE00009B for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:48:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <563532FCFAEC4386B95E68F6F3570E64@White> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:48:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1379454524; bh=2gDd6tDMqZ9vCxN4EGSS79j9q/43ceGSL3pzKQCZh8A=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=x1tZ3zZRoS20XQJksJf+ZPKd+Do5lhf4RN6IkrcNl1l9yqmJPBoQqOS97bE4kgQxv W2YEyKL1HZbNi3eU1WLciYmk2VtTwOrM3pG1Maq2vIf5/VkQMWfw5giqVD8xlmfJcz 0n4dKTfNgzXVVVXRdkwFDHscmhWzXwRNZCdOpnto= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33c65238ce38356c X-AOL-IP: 95.91.237.80 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: From: Markus Vester Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:43 PM To: Re: LF: Op-8, WSPR-15, JT9-10, SV3DVO? > ...Normally JT9 should be sent around 137.13 kHz, ie. 136.0 kHz "dial" plus around 1130 Hz audio... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.252.208 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: bf9cd6b3d49c805062abf73a1027fea8 Subject: LF: JT9 frequencies? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01CEB400.6E9C4DA0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 509 Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01CEB400.6E9C4DA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Markus Vester=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:43 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Op-8, WSPR-15, JT9-10, SV3DVO? > ...Normally JT9 should be sent around 137.13 kHz, ie. 136.0 kHz "dial" = plus around 1130 Hz audio... Hmm, thinking again, this statement was probably not correct. Actually = I'm not sure if there's anything like a recommended JT9 frequency range = on LF at all. Many of the earlier JT9 experiments took place in the = lower WSPR-2 band around 137.43 kHz. Best 73,=20 Markus (DF6NM) ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01CEB400.6E9C4DA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
From: Markus Vester
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:43 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: LF: Op-8, WSPR-15, JT9-10, = SV3DVO?

> ...Normally JT9 should be = sent around=20 137.13 kHz, ie. 136.0 kHz "dial" plus around 1130 Hz=20 audio...
 
 
Hmm, thinking again, this statement was probably not correct. = Actually I'm=20 not sure if there's anything like a recommended JT9 frequency range on = LF at=20 all. Many of the earlier JT9 experiments took place in the lower WSPR-2 = band=20 around 137.43 kHz.
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
 
 ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01CEB400.6E9C4DA0--