Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t83C1CDK023389 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:01:12 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ZXT91-0002d1-NF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:57:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ZXT91-0002cs-E4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:57:31 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXT7x-0007oZ-9d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:57:30 +0100 Received: from [192.168.178.23] ([185.78.62.78]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MhRUQ-1ZKsBP2GPK-00MbyO for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:56:09 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: From: Tobias DG3LV Message-ID: <55E834F5.5050008@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 13:54:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:HR/y+yyDtgNPDBnfeywNgACLquZ4Rm3s+lMd9Q873GGC0bHN9uL NiW1jbpCYVMQIBvoaeVHbGms90+WapGg+zyMF5K5GMXZHSnT02N+3colOg5RqnbIKKoof/n KkKSaArSlYihN+K+Yf7Zzmd9XUwgrzLA9B8OlUOfw3zWplTIqr98EQm8v4Yw+HfwikeSJpx q3wKUDSIgLi73nEYPKitA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DEZQY98I6ic=:dUhYiXMsrm/4vzAxpqHVHV CxBZDxIvZfLYYiv71+UHzNoPI76IJe1ZffJt4PaZsq3wvzOWCtdTsQGx653G2S5bkwGFes5Ig 2aEf2Jy+aP6NuTDnlpOrIViQhd/0Phpq5cZ0uqVd+2gvFMbmtzcgF6lgv5RSKYVvKPFj/Oqgr bvie7lnOSuMs/0nou9sdfqbL39XZOsgpml/5jWO0r1VQVr5VXxg4PG6iTro01S5hhOEqTQsHZ v2UsB1Zk+2SgklvKgyb5ZeYqGdUk4zwAvu9zMFe+gxQr+vV/MiZCg8cdo/winjoU0ChD2eiTo Y1930xwN2PyTZnudyiS85O3QpC9EB75WN5ZxaY3r50izkn09T4MdY/gbwAqnETutamk+0121g dX3znUmXZoJpBZztclav0Jk4b8FNeGKVpq5XN54srix+xJxb4v09qH8WpIbfY77iqJlry8oKb 7EeN52dDLaCXO4+6npSFRYxNFQc48SjT/RrPETujPVxL8xJj1lnXQQF68AjgUad4RWQo9rPUP UjY1x1WroaUcKOFT8FzN6TwINChWGZjupuk4o5EfLbLrQJrrhfoB98gVg8TYnXLs5lqGhGEWD mh3+NZUAiZq1P1oYXBHXVQJgYnroAULLUjDSEgsi6XUhmKULnFsVyfxIAGquKGB/PYU3ZEU/e 6A9rDrWL52/LBDkWS+22MupU4SxlFq6FhBGdn/muSgi1F8LZaeyTj4cHlO5mQ/Zu16CpZAofx GReftgExyIz2u66pIMm7nrbk+owhsiRsYYZ37fL5TGzr5sAjaGYeGTLqnoU= X-Scan-Signature: f62c7cf8eeb8e5a327b71719e9bffff1 Subject: Re: LF: Odd sunset captures Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4024 Hi Mike ! Your screenshot shows Stefan's Callsign as "". This means it was (identified as) one part of a multi-part transmission. To correlate those sequential transmissions WSPR uses a hash-table to identify the corresponding parts. In your case the 23:04 reception was erroneously correlated to a prior(!) transmission of Stefan. As the "decoded" grid is not a legal gridsquare, you can be shure the decoding is one of the rare incidents, where the significance threshold of the WSPR-decoder was still too low to eliminate false decodings. This happens from time to time, but you can identify those easily by inspecting the callsign or the gridsquare which are either illegal or implausible. 73 de dg3lv Tobias Am 03.09.2015 um 02:18 schrieb Michael Sapp: > Hi All: I'm not sure what to think of this.... > https://www.dropbox.com/s/xwnopmbl2fz5ye5/IMG_4537.JPG?dl=0 > I have been experimenting with IF shifting my radio to get WG2XJM very > strong signal 10 to 13 dB down the IF bandpass > curve to improve weak signal reception of other stations when Eric is > transmitting. Odd sunset partial captures appear > to be transatlantic, but I am not sure about reality with this data. My > EWE antenna was configured to favor a SE direction, but with > 120 degree 3dB beam width pattern it covers the NE as well. Long > distance transition zone propagation is a possibility, but I > would be hesitant to claim it not having received correct grid square > information...... > 73, Mike wa3tts