Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x3JFNtov013615 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:23:56 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hHVHJ-0003H8-Am for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 16:18:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hHVFr-0003Gn-EP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 16:16:43 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hHVFm-0000t0-ED for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 16:16:40 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmx.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1555686997; bh=CHhDLhd+fv+Dg+782dBHmcy2VeBzBdDfH1a6KI0yF04=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=lYcbrx7t+Qk5vUC0hkwNa0Or0oAt40UNQA5KzhElrnn6CB4FB/+vDs9H327+CZBUX kqdec8GCNXtn4w4eCrpy/dB4reQCxPSFhJmbhAx7idwPzrqRv1z4uZtfQfk4vPfuzr HVzWZQt0BIitchwg3Sawfnher6/HDpXzUn5FUsJU= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from Clemens0811 ([84.163.189.104]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MpUUw-1gTrAH0PM4-00ptFl for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:16:37 +0200 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <489912956.1184907.1555532989711.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <489912956.1184907.1555532989711@mail.yahoo.com> <5CB79073.30600@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5CB79073.30600@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:16:36 +0200 Message-ID: <559808A0C84F4073A94E20E3FE0F6863@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AdT1XqvhqTgpQqGJS/2wAx6SgalPjgBYI63A X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Q/vLs2ruh9XpRA9hNfGQYsRggcUsAiPYQDjPbkj0DcFmvqHZ64y GKXzVxDmbUZsTk9trf4WaiZGg4wWhbZ0wGP1juuPWer1tMTgtZX/gCc9ehg5DLyCoKYfmu/ P9Gr2xY+eIrRUvGHc8WurzL1yk3iCDQjSEoWp92JCF9qMFWyZS6/llIWozFD/Qo/h2YWZGU X1NayL7mmvsJChid/CIsg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:6vH4skB0yuI=:yyuuyPtj2pE7G9749+mf+u S9Fyva2xbOM45rzpFFfCpNu8N8gxFjkoOsRZJRu2T+g97gp31SITzDGUkx16F8FWpjxxCqy/4 hT+MB1wjc9VUtCB+bXNMFSd3UNzbBxN1jfIgzFWD4v7BOb1LGYs5l84HSYUJOT53ThVZxG3K2 bbQkI4y8bv+qRzoO92BK6EBTS860aym4Ilsrh1FCCkNzozKzqDsbVoDhUsUj84cNLxj5SM92f Z8U6Jbase4VWHGHd6b5lNinv5p53Ht7S1MlwqUW9p4CrkKohbd7syGMbKG2BmoKyibCGa2QIl R3NEVXLWLlR/JgpUdPAbQDb6RpgakYzIFykRPpIUfW5+qLqls8XcDeG2T4ZFmIsmRTBpgVRFR rRBIp4iM73embDpObVh+wqY1cqoamazJyom7n+3ndCIWGWu7uhezNg4C2iB6M/YXmm2Wv/I3h iIGkLDYkBTS02uX956g31EsBMgP1If9nqMcu0wskN1nfV1yxi2g7fTdOZ9D8IvT/N0OrsJVK+ yylb2O6h7TyGuaITS499M159vO/IXrYy8buJPV/FhyMoGC48wOtKFKhHxbQPwn0X98+IOgZ3D N2veXFdufEg+/QQa3DnyPa63xc/jb7FLUWA3pODYCJfoE/i2KovA4e3zc92InpuxS41C5JZ4J hNzxKHHbWHxl7TYjq6PqWnxSr8+gFXk7WHeZ6ZYk7fiGLy3wuV9v7rh9L9GHQeM7Op2IRr8ck o1QMWISOTwal4+Okjb6/H1ytLqaadv3StJFzrpR59ueYexdR8bonGwspVDIYxfyxvPoIkrvpt kEV3kGoD7x0fDyWs6cTI/Go5+9sEDeGtI2ezOexg9hfeclq3bV+UMGdKNVqhBwFMwstWnKr3r o7Pngg8T2es1f0N6dAwc3WaqooEyNJssBSBPzyz03qhv+YcpQpdrPSNR+JAyaQ X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, >A quick look to the database shows that the signal from Rik >looks clean at any RX site, except at DL4RAJ. >You know, the complainers ;-) There was indeed another multiple decode,albeit on the same frequency. Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-Scan-Signature: 3d0ae5b4ae8b74dc4bf5c1dbe3fef430 Subject: RE: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x3JFNtov013615 Hi Stefan, >A quick look to the database shows that the signal from Rik >looks clean at any RX site, except at DL4RAJ. >You know, the complainers ;-) There was indeed another multiple decode,albeit on the same frequency. 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475797 -3 0 JN64bw 0.5 DK7FC/P JN49ik 563 334 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475797 +1 0 JN64bw 0.5 DK7FC/P JN49ik 563 334 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of DK7FC >Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:46 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR > >Hi Markus, > >A quick look to the database shows that the signal from Rik >looks clean at any RX site, except at DL4RAJ. >You know, the complainers ;-) > >73, Stefan > > > >Am 17.04.2019 22:29, schrieb Markus Vester: > > Hi Clemens, > > the signal from Ric looks perfectly clean at DL0AO, >indeed a strong signal but no multiple decodes. > > 73, Markus > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Clemens Paul > An: rsgb_lf_group > > Cc: rsgb-lf-group > > Verschickt: Mi, 17. Apr. 2019 22:13 > Betreff: LF: IW4DXW with bad signal on MW in WSPR > > > Hello, > > IW4DXW is booming in here but unfortunately his signal has a > very poor purity,hence the multiple deoces. > > 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475802 -7 0 JN64bw 0.5 >DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 > 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475787 -7 0 JN64bw 0.5 >DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 > 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475794 0 0 JN64bw 0.5 >DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 > 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475775 -19 0 JN64bw 0.5 > DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 > 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475791 -6 0 JN64bw 0.5 >DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 > 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475772 -20 0 JN64bw 0.5 > DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 > 2019-04-17 20:02 IW4DXW 0.475760 -24 0 JN64bw 0.5 > DL4RAJ JN68kj 389 8 7 > > > 73 > > Clemens > DL4RAJ > > > > > > Virenfrei. >www.avg.com > > >