Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=1 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mailn.lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id uB493PNN003991 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 10:03:26 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cDSZJ-0002Fn-7T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:54:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cDSZI-0002Fe-SM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:54:44 +0000 Received: from smtp11.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.133] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cDSZG-0002ho-8d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:54:43 +0000 Received: from PCPMF ([92.142.237.10]) by mwinf5d22 with ME id Fkug1u00a0E8nxG03kugB2; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:54:40 +0100 X-ME-Helo: PCPMF X-ME-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:54:40 +0100 X-ME-IP: 92.142.237.10 Message-ID: <556FFEC1688540ABA4FC025EF28020F2@PCPMF> From: "F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB" To: References: <38F665123BD04C58B08CF78A0AABB747@malcoHP> <5842FA52.7080604@posteo.de> <6E85CA2FD058424EA9C210FA5A46324B@PCPMF>,<58431CA1.40809@vsas.de> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D87F120@servigilant.vigilant.local> <1A0F9D0A9AA34763A3E667502E0030D5@SV8CS> In-Reply-To: <1A0F9D0A9AA34763A3E667502E0030D5@SV8CS> Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 09:54:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 161201-0, 01/12/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested X-Scan-Signature: 09c1a181dc7b5fd4ce37590584a561d1 Subject: LF: De F6CNI : CW QSO PARTY report Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0024_01D24E14.66721270" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 9683 Ce message est composi et au format MIME. ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01D24E14.66721270 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HI all. For info, my short report about the CW QSO PARTY. I was only QRV = receiving CW, no transmitting. I was listening during 2 periods, each of = about 1 hour 1/2 long. RX FT1000MP full options (a fantastic CW RX on LF/MF) and as RX antenna = a vertical tube 9.5 m high, base loaded with a L circuit : serial 1.1 mH = coil and 4700 pF capacitor in parallel coaxial side. The window 472 =E2=80=93 475 kHz band was QRN quiet, but high QRM due to = the Poland NDB and his 2 x side AF modulations, which is coming here = 589. The segment 474.3 to 475.4 kHz is very clear and for me the best = choice for CW, but nobody was using it... The segment 472 =E2=80=93 = 472.7 is also clear but that is a pity to heard some high power station = staying long time on the QRG and calling and calling many and many CQ = without having the slightest consideration or the politeness for the = others.=20 I heard 16 stations in 7 DXCC countries.=20 The first QSO I heard was DJ6CB / G3YXM at 1657 TU. The strongest and best report 599+ to EA5DOM calling some CQ beginning = at 1822 TU. Some stations was calling him but no QSO. Later he worked = DK7FC. Also strong 599 report to DK7FC who had also at times some problems to = copy QRP station calling him. I did not copy my old friend Jeff F6BWO, because I was not listenint at = his QRV time. 73 @++ Andy. ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01D24E14.66721270 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
HI=20 all.
 
For info,=20 my short report about the CW QSO PARTY. I was only QRV receiving CW, no=20 transmitting. I was listening during 2 periods, each of about 1 hour 1/2 = long.
 
RX=20 FT1000MP full options (a fantastic CW RX on LF/MF) and as RX antenna a = vertical=20 tube 9.5 m high, base loaded with a L circuit : serial 1.1 mH coil and = 4700 pF=20 capacitor in parallel coaxial side.
 
The=20 window 472 =E2=80=93 475 kHz band was QRN quiet, but high QRM due to the = Poland NDB and=20 his 2 x side AF modulations, which is coming here 589. The segment 474.3 = to=20 475.4 kHz is very clear and for me the best choice for CW, but nobody = was using=20 it... The segment 472 =E2=80=93 472.7 is also clear but that is a pity = to heard some=20 high power station staying long time on the QRG and calling and calling = many and=20 many CQ without having the slightest consideration or the politeness for = the=20 others.
 
I heard 16 stations in 7 DXCC countries.
 
The first=20 QSO I heard was DJ6CB / G3YXM at 1657 TU.
 
The=20 strongest and best report 599+ to EA5DOM calling some CQ beginning at = 1822 TU.=20 Some stations was calling him but no QSO. Later he worked = DK7FC.
 
Also=20 strong 599 report to DK7FC who had also at times some problems to copy = QRP=20 station calling him.
 
I did not copy my old = friend Jeff F6BWO, because I was not listenint at = his QRV=20 time.
 
73 @++=20 Andy.
 
 
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0024_01D24E14.66721270--