Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t4Q0GUti014192 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 02:16:30 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Yx2VE-0001QZ-Jx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 01:13:52 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Yx2VE-0001QQ-5Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 01:13:52 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1Yx2VC-0007MW-Im for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 01:13:51 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([91.38.11.102]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LiTrM-1ZZOWV1ZKm-00ceMK for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 02:13:47 +0200 Message-ID: <5563BABB.5040909@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 02:13:47 +0200 From: Tobias DG3LV User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5561CEB5.3060506@charter.net>, <5561ECC1.8030301@kpnmail.nl> <556222D3.11110.8F3A44@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> <55623C9A.4060107@charter.net> <000e01d096dd$ac91f5d0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <556311FA.7090205@posteo.de> <55636912.1010105@no3m.net> <55636E96.3040506@posteo.de> <55638C47.1090402@freenet.de> <5563AD3E.2090204@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5563AD3E.2090204@posteo.de> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4AOxi1GqwnQWH8xYkA6ewOoYHPP+MLw/TH/k2lPOG7l2ZVZM+VK qKppMFIggflHyF879zFUB4D7YnItQ8DpV0UCcN824JgHQQeqx+X1o8QxeXfnAG7s9bCtLbc FV5ZhTkDd4maYkrMf826K6276Gkib4LMIcO5wI8/eqL7GeKluVDNZH+31jdguV/bJtfxDPx MElm37QMjOkFmm5ctU0Fw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: Re: LF: 630M WSPR T/A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3275 Hi MF ! This night I will be running (Rx only) two instances of WSPR-X in WSPR-2 and WSPR-15 mode on MF, if someone wants to do some testing. Antenna PA0RDT, Rx = Softrock 6.2, QTH JO53gv BTW : just saw someone transmitting frequently on 475.700 with a 9-second time-lag. Good signal, but -of course- no decodes! 73 de dg3lv Tobias Am 26.05.2015 um 01:16 schrieb DK7FC: > Am 25.05.2015 22:55, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: >> p.s. is there a possibility to filter / display only WSPR-15 decodes >> from the database, and how widespread is the use of that mode ? > > ...there have been a few MF TA tests in WSPR-15 in the early 630m days, > showing that this mode is to slow for the path on that band. These tests > have not been very extended though. But most likely there is not a > 'gain' of 9 dB over WSPR-2. I would assume that successful detections > are even less likely in that mode over the pond. > > 73, Stefan