Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1169; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t3B0A5Mi015570 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 02:10:05 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ygiwu-00004s-4N for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 01:07:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ygiwt-0008WP-QK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 01:06:59 +0100 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1Ygiwr-00033E-S7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 01:06:58 +0100 Received: by wiax7 with SMTP id x7so25919545wia.0 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:06:57 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=VnrpCJGfwvdJi0vqlAHpJT30eaCqTpVLX3BMFRzDaiY=; b=r+TJdAoMZPXcaMcoX0hNpIezQ+badZjbhrqb708dQ71KK77HKEq3+WUZ43lH8j42tX fFVxQtpxpriMqTT0eEobj+oPeUaUfVMAiDvAODnkKf+lcmvd036EA/6dtYeVDxxA8g8C HzGdeZxW6mnRTpqTZpmtiDTNCQNQKkXTuBo5LRCGoV8CbhaHISuGEIlY03YX+jq+87ww hCHZ+zSIEpYT1CqB1+xM09JQIgTL/A9ZFWK+yAXhHX4dfWGd2BLbWPR3upSKP4AOuDBw oigRyaCNTP6iu+WixeYkHqVxIwD2jKO08YNbWsXMJcHTo0fk+BP4A1ybTiNlsVZyDNDm dTEA== X-Received: by 10.180.95.135 with SMTP id dk7mr1960940wib.64.1428710817218; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 16sm418359wjs.41.2015.04.10.17.06.56 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 17:06:56 -0700 (PDT) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5528659F.3040801@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 02:06:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <55241671.878.1B2B18E@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>, <001401d07218$61c9efb0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <5525671E.4764.1ADB85C@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <55257F60.9090207@gmail.com> <5528268F.2020206@gmail.com> <249562EC416A444DB7F5631A010B6CB9@White> <5528435C.4040709@gmail.com> <31738B43EA08427EA5EFF61452B01440@White> <5528566C.7010703@gmail.com> <2F987DE866CF401C867A74C411EA5622@White> In-Reply-To: <2F987DE866CF401C867A74C411EA5622@White> X-Scan-Signature: 3dad7246509e3b317974c9d84e795ac1 Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 test on LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080603080807060704060900" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2939 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080603080807060704060900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Markus, Now i'm monitoring in "your" version. Could you run a single sequence in JT9-10 on LF for testing? 73, Stefan Am 11.04.2015 01:09, schrieb Markus Vester: > Uploaded the installer here: > http://df6nm.bplaced.net/wsjt/WSJTX_05r2788.exe (about 7 MB) > 73, Markus > > *From:* DK7FC > *Sent:* Saturday, April 11, 2015 1:02 AM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: JT9-10 test on LF > > Hi Markus, > > Uuuh 137.615 is brave because there are some strong signals close to > that QRG from time to time... > > Maybe the crash of the newer version is due to win7? Could you publish > the older version again? A dropbox link maybe? > > 73, Stefan > > > Am 10.04.2015 23:52, schrieb Markus Vester: >> Hi Stefan, >> I'm still using an oldfer version (WSJT-X v0.5 r2788) on the XP >> netbook, seems to run with no trouble. Got R7NT with -29 dB and was >> trying to call him, but he seems to have gone into a fade now. >> Had a very nice QSO with Domenico a couple of days ago. At the time >> we were around 137615 (as he had announced), almost 500 Hz higher. >> Well I guess "dial" frequency can be confusing ... >> Best 73, >> Markus >> >> *From:* DK7FC >> *Sent:* Friday, April 10, 2015 11:40 PM >> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> *Subject:* Re: LF: JT9-10 test on LF >> >> R, does the program work on your side and can you decode him? >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> ... --------------080603080807060704060900 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Markus,

Now i'm monitoring in "your" version. Could you run a single sequence in JT9-10 on LF for testing?

73, Stefan

Am 11.04.2015 01:09, schrieb Markus Vester:
Uploaded the installer here: http://df6nm.bplaced.net/wsjt/WSJTX_05r2788.exe (about 7 MB)
 
73, Markus
 

From: DK7FC
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 test on LF

Hi Markus,

Uuuh 137.615 is brave because there are some strong signals close to that QRG from time to time...

Maybe the crash of the newer version is due to win7? Could you publish the older version again? A dropbox link maybe?

73, Stefan


Am 10.04.2015 23:52, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hi Stefan,
 
I'm still using an oldfer version (WSJT-X v0.5 r2788) on the XP netbook, seems to run with no trouble. Got R7NT with -29 dB and was trying to call him, but he seems to have gone into a fade now.
 
Had a very nice QSO with Domenico a couple of days ago. At the time we were around 137615 (as he had announced), almost 500 Hz higher. Well I guess "dial" frequency can be confusing ...
 
Best 73,
Markus 

From: DK7FC
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 test on LF

R, does the program work on your side and can you decode him?

73, Stefan

...
--------------080603080807060704060900--