From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <551BDA98.1050504@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:46:32 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4698D0522AFD45F896A41F2D16A2D831@AGB> <BC1061758A4D4230AA9719C22735EBF4@gnat> <19EEF7A6DD30462FA6ACC0F015DC9F52@AGB> <5509E3D5.90900@gmail.com> <55102D0C.8040405@gmail.com>,<55148587.3090101@gmail.com> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234F1A25@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <520562D5C7694FF69C20E595E00B793D@F6CNIToshiba> <55155AD6.1090102@gmail.com> <551B07AA.5010900@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1503312003210.9373@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1503312003210.9373@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR at 4xf from a Raspberry Pi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Joe,

Am 01.04.2015 00:42, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> That's very clever.  It seems the code is quite complex; can you explain
> how it generates a carrier to someone who is an ungifted programmer?

Not really. There are some key-words that i know, like 'fractional 
divider'... but i don't understand the code. But that isn't necessary 
for the modification i wanted to realise.

> My level is not much better than this:
>
> def beep13(t2):
>   i=0
>   while i<500*t2:
>     i+=1
>     GPIO.output(13,1) #GPIO.HIGH)
>     time.sleep(0.001)
>     GPIO.output(13,0) #GPIO.LOW)
>     time.sleep(0.001)
>   return
>
> I used this piece of python as a 500 Hz side tone for a pi keyer but
> doubt it will work at 479 kHz.
Yes, it would not work. I've also tested a similar program to drive a 
LED at high frequencies. The output-f is unstable, high jitter...

If you want to use the WSPR function, you just need to read the 
informations on the links i recently sent. 2 weeks ago i have been in 
the same situation ;-)

73, Stefan

>
> 73 and thanks for the reports on your progress.
>
> Joe