Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1169; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,
RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t2TGUFNt032079
for <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:30:15 +0200
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1YcG3k-0004eX-FP
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:27:36 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1YcG3j-0004eO-KH
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:27:35 +0100
Received: from mta11.charter.net ([216.33.127.80])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.85)
(envelope-from <w1tag@charter.net>)
id 1YcG3g-0001zu-Dw
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:27:34 +0100
Received: from imp11 ([10.20.200.11]) by mta11.charter.net
(InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP
id <20150329162729.PDWT5815.mta11.charter.net@imp11>
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>;
Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:27:29 -0400
Received: from mtaout001.msg.strl.va.charter.net ([68.114.190.26])
by imp11 with smtp.charter.net
id 9UTV1q0020adFl805UTVom; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:27:29 -0400
Received: from impout005 ([68.114.189.20])
by mtaout001.msg.strl.va.charter.net
(InterMail vM.9.00.015.01 201-2473-143-101) with ESMTP
id <20150329162729.SHIS3648.mtaout001.msg.strl.va.charter.net@impout005>
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>;
Sun, 29 Mar 2015 11:27:29 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([68.118.229.27])
by impout005 with charter.net
id 9UTV1q00B0c6mLs01UTVSC; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 11:27:29 -0500
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=ePqdjRZ1 c=1 sm=1 tr=0
a=WLV0DKOOKFWiVcf2giHCRw==:117 a=WLV0DKOOKFWiVcf2giHCRw==:17 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8
a=73ab78M7B2EA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=pk98dNkv4nc4AP0oalMA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
X-Auth-id: dzF0YWdAY2hhcnRlci5uZXQ=
Message-ID: <551827F1.2080305@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:27:29 -0400
From: John Andrews <w1tag@charter.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4698D0522AFD45F896A41F2D16A2D831@AGB> <BC1061758A4D4230AA9719C22735EBF4@gnat> <19EEF7A6DD30462FA6ACC0F015DC9F52@AGB> <5509E3D5.90900@gmail.com> <55102D0C.8040405@gmail.com>,<55148587.3090101@gmail.com> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234F1A25@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <520562D5C7694FF69C20E595E00B793D@F6CNIToshiba>,<55155AD6.1090102@gmail.com> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234F1AFC@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be>,<551560D0.1040306@gmail.com> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234F1B3A@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <551734A0.3090005@gmail.com> <5517ED59.10203@charter.net> <60ED0A877BFF4C1D852D99B6F81A5820@White>
In-Reply-To: <60ED0A877BFF4C1D852D99B6F81A5820@White>
X-Scan-Signature: 5c1f37c04fc013ebbc2288fd3791d043
Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 2810
Markus,
> Wonder what the little dash below Stefan's "F" was... possibly local QRM
> from some MFSK PLC system? We sometimes seem to find a number of
> unexplained scattered dashes on North American QRSS spectrograms.
Yes, I live in the land of unexplained dashes, at least here in
Massachusetts. Mixed in with the normal RF pollution are signal patterns
that seem to suggest some form of control or communication. I was
watching some signals near WD2XKO's frequency a week or so ago. Other
than a roughly 10 minute spacing between start times, I couldn't find
any real pattern. I don't recall such things from years ago, so it's
possible that this is something new. Inquiries on the Lowfer reflector
showed that the near-XKO signals were very local to me. Perhaps they are
artifacts of something larger which I would see by looking at wider
bandwidths, and I'll start looking.
The truly paranoid among U.S. Amateurs might think that these are PLC
related signals moved into this range to provide yet more arguments
against a 2200M ham band here. Hmmmm....
John, W1TAG