Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t2LBu7iI002572 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:56:07 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1YZHxJ-0002qE-HZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 11:52:41 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1YZHxJ-0002q5-7Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 11:52:41 +0000 Received: from mout3.freenet.de ([195.4.92.93]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YZHxH-0001LR-2e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 11:52:40 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1YZHxE-0005yR-SQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:52:36 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:36787 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1YZHxE-0000Qr-O4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:52:36 +0100 Received: from mx7.freenet.de ([195.4.92.17]:42742) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1YZHuQ-0007Po-He for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:49:42 +0100 Received: from x4d086ff4.dyn.telefonica.de ([77.8.111.244]:2845 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mx7.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.82 #2) id 1YZHuQ-0006G3-8z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:49:42 +0100 Message-ID: <550D5AD4.8070201@freenet.de> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:49:40 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20150320221323.GC4255@cs.utwente.nl> In-Reply-To: <20150320221323.GC4255@cs.utwente.nl> X-Originated-At: 77.8.111.244!2845 X-Scan-Signature: c0336009bd9bab526ca27d297ea7579a Subject: Re: LF: eclipse observations on Twente WebSDR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2751 Thanks for the 'fullday' displeay Pieter-Tjerk - very impressive. The frequency of that unstable QRM just below 500 kHz seems to depend on the sunlight intensity ... free-running solar cell inverter in the neighbourhood, or the AC mains voltage itself was affected ? There were concerns by german electricity companies about how to keep the grid stable (when the sun re-appeared) but apparently nothing bad happened. 73, Wolf DL4YHF p.s. no visible eclipse here, it was foggy until the afternoon and unusually cold. Screenshot of VLF station fieldstrength (already posted in the yahoo group): http://dl4yhf.darc.de/Eclipse_DL4YHF_2015_03_20.jpg Am 20.03.2015 23:13, schrieb Pieter-Tjerk de Boer: > During the eclipse (and in fact already a few days in advance), I've > been logging signal strengths over the entire 0 to 29 MHz spectrum > using my WebSDR system in Enschede, The Netherlands. > As was to be expected, the eclipse's effect was very clear on medium > wave broadcast signals, and also on longwave, with, as Roelof already > pointed out, Iceland's broadcast coming in very strongly. > > Surprisingly, on one broadcast station I saw a dip in propagation rather > than enhancement, namely the 216 kHz longwave transmitter in southern > France. Could that be due to destructive interference between skywave > and groundwave? > > Preliminary results, including a wideband waterfall display, are now on > http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~ptdeboer/ham/eclipse2015/ ; but more > analysis still needs to be done. > > Regards, > Pieter-Tjerk, PA3FWM > > >