From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <5502D044.5070605@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:55:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <ud3m05bwueiaqs5jiiyoci3d.1394044265947@email.android.com> <53179301.8080002@broadpark.no> <53187B41.3020201@gmx.net> <53188931.8020805@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>,<55021CD4.2040805@gmail.com> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234EA8DC@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be>
In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234EA8DC@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be>
Subject: Re: LF: Activity etc. - DG3LV discussion -One year later
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------040600070903090305090405"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040600070903090305090405
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Rik,

Interesting statistic.
Well, when looking to the WSPR map you can see that you (and me) are 
quite in the center of activity. If you can work a station in CW you 
probably prefer that against QRSS (e.g. we both preferred CW in the 
past). That has an effect on the statistic. Likely it would look 
different for a EA stn, beeing about 1000 km outside that center of 
activity.
Of course we know that QRSS 'goes farer' than CW. So your conclusion is 
right :-)

73, Stefan

The original discussion was based on the statement by Tobias:
>> Am 06.03.2014 14:42, schrieb Tobias DG3LV:
>> [...]bed effect (fascination of listening to CW) is not present, that 
>> critical mass can never be hold! Because, as you say, it's all the 
>> time the same if you don't know what to tell. So, after a few QSOs, 
>> newcomers tend to become bored.
>>
>>> It will take a time to establish a new mode for everyday use. There 
>>> is a good chance that WSQ will become an effective keyboard to 
>>> keyboard mode that is used frequently. Just a fortnight ago we first 
>>> heard about it by you, its definitely too early to dismiss it.
>> Then let us wait another year and have a conclusion then :-) Maybe i 
>> am wrong, which would be good :-)
>>
>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>

--------------040600070903090305090405
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Rik, <br>
<br>
Interesting statistic.<br>
Well, when looking to the WSPR map you can see that you (and me) are
quite in the center of activity. If you can work a station in CW you
probably prefer that against QRSS (e.g. we both preferred CW in the
past). That has an effect on the statistic. Likely it would look
different for a EA stn, beeing about 1000 km outside that center of
activity.<br>
Of course we know that QRSS 'goes farer' than CW. So your conclusion is
right :-)<br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
The original discussion was based on the statement by Tobias:<br>
<blockquote
 cite="mid:7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234EA8DC@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be"
 type="cite">
  <div
 style="direction: ltr; font-family: Tahoma; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 10pt;">
  <div
 style="font-size: 16px; font-family: Times New Roman; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
  <div>
  <blockquote type="cite">Am 06.03.2014 14:42, schrieb Tobias DG3LV: <br>
[...]bed effect (fascination of listening to CW) is not present, that
critical mass can never be hold! Because, as you say, it's all the time
the same if you don't know what to tell. So, after a few QSOs,
newcomers tend to become bored. <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite">It will take a time to establish a new mode
for everyday use. There is a good chance that WSQ will become an
effective keyboard to keyboard mode that is used frequently. Just a
fortnight ago we first heard about it by you, its definitely too early
to dismiss it. <br>
    </blockquote>
Then let us wait another year and have a conclusion then :-) Maybe i am
wrong, which would be good :-)
    <br>
    <br>
73, Stefan/DK7FC <br>
    <br>
  </blockquote>
  </div>
  </div>
  </div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------040600070903090305090405--