X-GM-THRID: 1206998527368179909 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 3bdfea885026432927412fe53ffb58dd9e82ae63 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.127.17 with SMTP id z17cs3279wrc; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.85.9 with SMTP id n9mr2909418nfl; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id p45si3423483nfa.2006.06.23.16.19.26; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FtutV-0005uD-PU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:16:57 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FtutV-0005u4-1s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:16:57 +0100 Received: from imo-d23.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.137]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FtutP-0005DW-KW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:16:56 +0100 Received: from G0MRF@aol.com by imo-d23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id l.54e.19e7c (65099) for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:16:42 -0400 (EDT) From: G0MRF@aol.com Message-ID: <54e.19e7c.31cdd05a@aol.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:16:42 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5014 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-1.101,HTML_30_40=0.056,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178 Subject: Re: LF: RE: Top-fed LF antenna idea Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1151104602" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5677 -------------------------------1151104602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 23/06/2006 17:22:09 GMT Standard Time, j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk writes: Dear Peter, LF Group, As I recall, G0MRF's first trans-atlantic transmission was done from the top of a tower block with a down-sloping wire as "top loading" - Perhaps David would care to fill in the details... Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU Hello Jim / Peter. I thought of the transatlantic contact when I read your post. However the comparison to the EH antenna is a difficult one to make. In my case I was trying to construct a center loaded dipole using 250 foot elements, or about 12 degrees at 136k, with the feed point perhaps 180 feet above ground. In the event, the dipole proved very difficult to resonate and I eventually settled for paralleling the two 250 ft wires and feeding them against the several kilometres of copper water pipe running through the building. That worked very nicely with good QRSS3 signals visible in VO1 with RF down to 300W at the TX site. Sadly that building was demolished 2 years ago, so no opportunity for another visit. _http://www.g0mrf.freeserve.co.uk/atlantic.htm_ (http://www.g0mrf.freeserve.co.uk/atlantic.htm) Unfortunately I never did manage to get my dipole working. However, 6 years later my homebrew N2PK vector network analyser is nearing completion and later this summer I hope to 'borrow' some land on very poor earth and finally put up a full size dipole and make some serious measurements. (The poor earth is a key factor in the master plan! ) Will it work? - who knows! Certainly the scale model on 21MHz positioned 50mm above my lawn made it to a rather incredulous amateur in Romania. Regards David G0MRF -------------------------------1151104602 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 23/06/2006 17:22:09 GMT Standard Time,=20 j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk writes:
Dear=20 Peter, LF Group,

As I recall, G0MRF's first trans-atlantic transmis= sion=20 was done from the top
of a tower block with a down-sloping wire as "top= =20 loading" - Perhaps David
would care to fill in the=20 details...

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de=20 M0BMU
Hello Jim / Peter.
 
I thought of the transatlantic contact when I read your post. However t= he=20 comparison to the EH antenna is a difficult one to make. In my case I was tr= ying=20 to construct a center loaded dipole using 250 foot elements, or about 1= 2=20 degrees at 136k, with the feed point perhaps 180 feet above=20 ground.  In the event, the dipole proved very difficult to resonate and= I=20 eventually settled for paralleling the two 250 ft wires and feeding the= m=20 against the several kilometres of copper water pipe running through the=20 building.  That worked very nicely with good QRSS3 signals visible in V= O1=20 with RF down to 300W at the TX site.
Sadly that building was demolished 2 years ago, so no opportunity for=20 another visit.
 
http://www.g0mrf.free= serve.co.uk/atlantic.htm
 
Unfortunately I never did manage to get my dipole working.  Howeve= r, 6=20 years later my homebrew N2PK vector network analyser is nearing completion a= nd=20 later this summer I hope to 'borrow' some land on very poor earth and finall= y=20 put up a full size dipole and make some serious measurements. (The poor eart= h is=20 a key factor in the master plan! ) Will it work? - who knows! Certainly the=20 scale model on 21MHz positioned 50mm above my lawn made it to a rather=20 incredulous amateur in Romania.
 
Regards
 
David  G0MRF
 
 
-------------------------------1151104602--