Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1169; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t1SCnked000983 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:49:47 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1YRgnj-00072d-1o for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:47:23 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1YRgni-00072U-Mk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:47:22 +0000 Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1YRgng-0006sY-Pm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:47:21 +0000 Received: by wevk48 with SMTP id k48so25096715wev.3 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 04:47:19 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=57bhh2gil2FjO/feHbObJTWAFflKE2fNkLMoWDrjJg8=; b=NC1TDX70ONH3ny9EvRUgEhJyCSlbWOPKqiTUF9x5Wa4JSTRLfrvQ0a2oM8wcOHlYE7 2+AcxNewy7XdSUIKg9Gmn5Vx4GvKfzhBq4/ImOhEVDvPIKCYf/85M0lyrQOALamoEHK7 yWzFmvUMdvSqNcqNHvLs6XVztJYg3J0kVm832T/VZKWZcdK5c7OAvVXSkh0otE6isiUY sKp6C+yPnvZV/g+ty+lEpvrPpXvx0GYELwmQMJhdFOYNy8kfHWwwkGyHjRkU1ld/gZr8 Lvb+fksuyka0Db+4LYklahyM/AmMBoCZkv1g/XsF4858UJoQP0+yfOsnxG9gmhc6az77 488g== X-Received: by 10.180.212.8 with SMTP id ng8mr16338740wic.18.1425127639869; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 04:47:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fm10sm6941946wib.7.2015.02.28.04.47.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Feb 2015 04:47:19 -0800 (PST) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <54F1B8D5.8070307@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:47:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" References: <54EE1D9A.5000504@gmail.com> <54EE306F.30108@abelian.org> <54F1A71B.5080005@gmail.com> <9A7D6A846ABF40A382393A2FF50DF994@White> <54F1B788.7080405@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54F1B788.7080405@gmail.com> X-Scan-Signature: 54c274b8b0f8da777e8f702c98fe24ad Subject: Re: LF: Todays monitor size Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020405030305010008080600" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2479 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020405030305010008080600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit PS: I admit, the screen becomes a bit flat then, like Loriot's superscope! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln5zXRaLvAY 73, Stefan Am 28.02.2015 13:41, schrieb DK7FC: > Hi Markus, > > I've just checked it with my smartphone which also has a resolution of > 1024x600. > There is a large grabber window on > http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_remote_Grabber.html now, > for testing. > > The smartphone (being smart!) does automatically scale the image so it > fits into the display, without a slider and the necesesseraritirtity > to move it. > Maybe this function is available to all these days? > > 73, Stefan > > Am 28.02.2015 12:40, schrieb Markus Vester: >> Stefan, >> for me, rather not ... I'm mostly using a netbook which has a 1024 x >> 600 screen. The latest and often most interesting part of the >> spectrogram is usually on the right hand side. >> 73 Markus (DF6NM) >> >> *From:* DK7FC >> *Sent:* Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:31 PM >> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> *Subject:* LF: Todays monitor size >> >> Hi all, >> >> A few years ago we had the discussion about ideal size for grabber >> /spectrogram dimensions. The consensus was 1024 pixels horizontal. >> >> Would you (all) still vote for that size? >> >> Since > 5 years i'm now using a 22'' monitor with a resolution of >> 1680x1050 pixels. Of yourse it would be much better to have wider >> images, covering a longer time... >> >> I would tend to increase the size to 1600 pixels on at least a few >> grabber windows. >> >> Opinions please. >> >> 73, Stefan >> --------------020405030305010008080600 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit PS: I admit, the screen becomes a bit flat then, like Loriot's superscope! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln5zXRaLvAY

73, Stefan

Am 28.02.2015 13:41, schrieb DK7FC:
Hi Markus,

I've just checked it with my smartphone which also has a resolution of 1024x600.
There is a large grabber window on http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_remote_Grabber.html now, for testing.

The smartphone (being smart!) does automatically scale the image so it fits into the display, without a slider and the necesesseraritirtity to move it.
Maybe this function is available to all these days?

73, Stefan

Am 28.02.2015 12:40, schrieb Markus Vester:
Stefan,
 
for me, rather not ... I'm mostly using a netbook which has a 1024 x 600 screen. The latest and often most interesting part of the spectrogram is usually on the right hand side.
 
73 Markus (DF6NM)

From: DK7FC
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:31 PM
Subject: LF: Todays monitor size

Hi all,

A few years ago we had the discussion about ideal size for grabber
/spectrogram dimensions. The consensus was 1024 pixels horizontal.

Would you (all) still vote for that size?

Since > 5 years i'm now using a 22'' monitor with a resolution of
1680x1050 pixels. Of yourse it would be much better to have wider
images, covering a longer time...

I would tend to increase the size to 1600 pixels on at least a few
grabber windows.

Opinions please.

73, Stefan

--------------020405030305010008080600--