From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <54E5BB5D.7070809@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:30:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <97CF0B1C-93C3-4667-8AFB-EF3B559FF9AE@iz7pdx.it>, <799A8358-390F-4A95-8B4F-ACF90396344E@iz7pdx.it>, <E1YNSl7-0005ba-U7@post.thorcom.com>,<54E2FF75.7175.12D068@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234C4CD6@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <42D8BC9A2A8A46C79FF84CD152672225@uwePC> <A59E4DEF4D8C4D609566DD4572D21D9E@Clemens0811> <99BCD526551E4B13A520C09453AEF712@uwePC> <170772064B0E4DEDB031E77B175BC796@Clemens0811> <421F1959F2D342BA912EBA839B6CD5FC@uwePC> <2A449761779C4CD9B2DA26915B1391AF@Clemens0811> <54E3A561.6060007@gmx.net> <34041AE6158A41F6A5FD0D941BC0E264@Clemens0811> <A2D0CDEA90244293A8DAF02AE13F0ED3@uwePC> <E2974873821B4091B34B1D72C54D1C0C@Clemens0811> <0F0E3CDC942D4E5C892E91B5A0ACD5BC@uwePC> <035419E6F8C247F5B9C9C6B64F69392B@Clemens0811> <778BF068A3CC42C59FC5EDD1D898CF17@uwePC> <54E4CA62.30307@gmail.com> <B4FA8911094E4966992393EBCC51A03E@White> <E6DC3E5CEC7E4892BF0F986B989304F9@uwePC> <5AA58296D5D54B9DBC9E4D131D6AC32B@Clemens0811>
In-Reply-To: <5AA58296D5D54B9DBC9E4D131D6AC32B@Clemens0811>
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: WSPR 630m
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

I agree with Clemens (exceptionally ;-) ).
You should be decoded by someone in a range below 200 km. Try in 
daytime! The groundwave SNR could be better than at night, at least for 
distances arround 100 km, or over water!
Which antenna current do you get with your 1.3 W ?

73, Stefan

Am 19.02.2015 10:47, schrieb Clemens Paul:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> congrats to successfully debugging.
> Now it's time to try again today. :-)
> Is the antenna properly matched to 50 Ohm?
> If so you shold get some spots this evening, even with only with 1.3watts.
>
> 73
> Clemens
> DL4RAJ
>
>
>    
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of wensauer
>> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:37 AM
>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> Subject: LF: Re: WSPR 630m
>>
>> Yes - Dial was one obstacle.
>> As cw enthusiast, was thinking in "CW".
>> now I can decod myself and others.
>> Need mor power and/ or bigger antenna
>>
>> 73
>> Uwe
>>
>> From: Markus Vester<mailto:markusvester@aol.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:25 PM
>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 630m
>>
>> If you receive yourself, wspr(x) will decode and display your
>> own callsign locally, but the spots won't appear in the
>> wsprnet database. You could circumvent this by modifying your
>> callsign in the wsprx setup dialog (eg. something like
>> DK1KQ/2), but normally this is not very useful.
>>
>> BTW those unid dashes on 136.7 kHz actually looked a bit like
>> failed 33% wspr transmissions, except for wrong frequency,
>> missing modulation, and slightly short.
>>
>> 73, Markus
>>
>>
>>
>> From: DK7FC<mailto:73dk7fc@googlemail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 6:22 PM
>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 630m
>>
>>
>> Hi Uwe,
>>
>> If you can decode other stations, you must of course decode
>> yourselfe as
>> well. If not, there is either a time- or frequency shift. You will see
>> it in the WSPR-waterfall. As a test, disconnect your RX
>> antenna and look
>> on your own signal which should be strong enough. It must
>> appear to the
>> right time and frequency band.
>> Maybe you are transmitting 1500 Hz to high? I don't know the
>> Ultimate 3s
>> but maybe there is the old problem with that "dial" frequency.
>> "dial" is
>> set to 474.200 kHz. Just try that to be sure...
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>
>> ...
>>
>>      
>
>